this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

16595 readers
792 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration will soon announce sharply lower vehicle fuel-economy standards, reversing a push by the prior administration ​to force automakers to build more fuel-efficient vehicles, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy ‌said Monday.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

oil barons getting what they paid for.

[–] CactusEcho@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

US speed running to idiocracy.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Because GOP doesnt give a shit about the environment, especially when profits can be increased

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org -1 points 6 days ago

which is good i guess because adding 1% fuel efficiency ends up making the engine 15% more expensive at a certain point; you can't go below a certain fuel consumption level but if you try, you pay hard for it.

[–] Mok98@feddit.it 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's not like it will change much, with the war going on skyrocketing the fuel price

[–] AviAdi@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If anything, this is the stupidest response to the fuel crisis 🤣

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago

so far..stupidest, so far....

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, on-brand for this administration.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Just when you think it can't get any stupider, here we go.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

Have you read the Venezuela news?

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago

"(increase) fuel spending by $185 billion", disincentives electric cars. It's wrapped up like it's a good thing, but that's a red herring.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I am not really sure what it means. The CAFE standards we had encouraged larger, less fuel efficient vehicles and discouraged smaller, more efficient ones.

While I wanna shout at the headline, fuel economy standards are something we need to revisit anyway.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

Just what nobody wanted or needed!

[–] Fossy@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)