this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
71 points (98.6% liked)

United Kingdom

4982 readers
239 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Came here to say this.

[–] Bigfish@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm sure this won't be abused by law enforcement. Nope.

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Post-birth screening is already very widely utilised in most western countries.

E.g.

[–] snaprails@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Of course not, the rozzers won’t be able to afford to buy it from Palantir.

[–] Krill@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Well parental consent to this is going to be interesting, given the father only gets it if the name is on the birth certificate (so marrital state is relevant) and that wouldn't happen for several weeks. So really the mother gets to decide...so paternity fraud is going be forefront of discussions.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Already widely used in the western world, glad we're catching up. This will save lives, hopefully lessen strain on the NHS, reduce waiting times, and reduce the misery of kids silently suffering without proper support.

Goes without saying, but this data should remain with the NHS, and the only time it should leave is when appropriately anonymised for medical research purposes (which already happens, the NHS helps a shit load of international researchers).

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Already widely used in the western world

Really?

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Minnesota, here. New parent. Can confirm! The full on DNA test is optional. Parents can make informed decisions and prepare for new lifestyles of supporting a kid that’s differently abled.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It should not remain in the NHS in my opinion. It should be deleted after the analysis is done.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't think having a full genome and medical history of everyone who'd been in contact with the NHS would be useful to researchers?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

I'm sure it would be very useful. Doesn't mean I want ANYBODY having that kind of information.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In Isreal, it's illegal to get genetic testing done

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 1 day ago

What's the logic there?

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Sounds like they need to speed up the test, if it takes 10 years then they won’t be babies anymore by the time they get results.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com -3 points 1 day ago

Thank god. Paternity fraud finally not so easy.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago

One of the things we did during the pandemic was significantly scale up or ability to sequence genomes. We were literally watching the virus evolve near real-time because a large chunk of samples could be sequenced and processed.

While they're are obviously data privacy concerns, for which the UK has a fairly long history of legislating for, having a full sequence for every newborn could allow for all sorts of cheaper early interventions. I'm sure the dataset would also be very useful for researchers as well.