this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
268 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

71843 readers
4523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 5 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

It's not evolving backwards. It's being carefully crafted to turn into exactly what corporations wanted from the beginning but couldn't do due to technical and legal limitations.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 minutes ago

It's also devolving, having less features, being slower/less optimised and so on. Cramming "AI" into it isn't devolving, it's enshitification

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So is my edc to match it lmao.

Phones are locking down and getting harder to get rom and root support and a lot of projects are either giving up or dying.

Welp! Back to the laptop I go! Been carrying it with me everywhere just like I did before I got a smartphone. The only duties my phone needs to do is make calls, answer SMS and RCS and tether.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

Could’ve said a version of this about every multi-function pocketable device ever made, but they’re still fun

[–] atlien51@lemm.ee 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe we’ve been pushing way too hard, way too fast into the age of technology being integrated into our every waking moment, bros.

I’m ready to go back to like an iPhone 5 level of technology and Windows 7. Just wish it was realistic.

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

24/7 connectivity was a mistake. I miss that brief window when we had cheap supercomputers in our pockets, but data was still expensive.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The word you're looking for is "devolving".

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That would make sense if evolution had a direction. But evolution can favor less complexity just as well as more: it depends on the selective pressures it's under. "Fittest" is not necessarily "best."

This applies metaphorically to marketed products as well as literally to biologiccal systems. It's not inevitable that the marketplace will deliver progress. You might never get that invisible handjob.

[–] deaf_fish@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago

No devolving makes sense. The natural pressures are causing the user interface to be worse.

[–] tresspass@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

I prefer "enshitification"

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Evolving backwards would be returning to ergonomic UIs with clear HIG being followed, having a scriptable variant for every class of applications, and any piece of software, OS UI included, not acting as an advert. Contrasts and colors and bright pictures are not what I need to see while working. It's as if your screwdriver was built in the form of an alien fish dildo, and had a chain of ringing bells. Why is this bullshit considered normal and usual with computer interfaces, I dunno.

And a company's website is its interface to the world, for the user. Not its advert. They've already seen the advert or don't need it if they are on that website! They want to actually use it.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

an alien fish dildo

That sounds intriguing.

[–] Pirate@feddit.org 0 points 4 hours ago

I think you'll find that, sadly, nobody is worse for HIG than software engineers, especially Linux aficionados.

They like their design as unpalatable and shit-lookalike as possible.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the irony is that title was probably AI generated.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He admitted that he had to use AI a little bit after a somewhat broken finger.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Doubt. If I can type with one hand while chatting with those hot women in my area, this guy can type with nine fingers.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What? He kinda broke a finger and then suddenly needed to use AI? His one bad finger prevented him using the other 9? He couldn't speech-to-text it?

Or did AI break his finger to get him to make the video?!

[–] tonytins@pawb.social -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There is a video for you to watch and get the context.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not clicking on what looks like an AI slop YouTube video just to find out why a guy making a video about AI needed to use AI to make the video. Beyond seeing clippy for nostalgia, seeing that it's likely a video about MS I care even less.

If you actually thought it was a video of value, you could have written (or just copy/pasta) a description of the video and why it might be of interest.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 0 points 1 day ago

I’m not your AI assistant.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's a reference to "it is evolving, just backwards"

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's simple - if your product or platform uses dark patterns, I will not use it. I will even use an inferior platform or product in order to be free to choose how I use my software.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean by dark patterns?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Design that is in the interest of someone other than the user, intended to coerce or trick the user into behaviors that benefit that non-user at the user's expense.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

Examples:

  • Microtransactions instead of asking for the price up-front
  • Using gambling mechanics in non-gambling games (e.g. loot boxes)
  • Eliminating potential stopping points in the user interaction, like e.g. endless scrolling instead of pagination
  • Using big, visually engaging buttons for the actions they want the user to perform ("Accept tracking") while using tiny, grey links for the actions they don't want the user to perform ("Reject tracking"), or even worse, hiding the action they don't want the user to perform behind multiple menues.
  • Using wording that creates fear or other negative emotions to stop users from performing such actions ("If you cancel your subscription now, you will lose access to this, this, and that. Everything you did will be lost. Do you really want to do that?")
  • Disguising ads and other non-organic content as organic content. ("I found this product and it cured my hair loss, my potency issues and made me rich at the same time! ~sponsored ad~")
  • Disguising ads as notifications
  • Disguising ads as the download button
  • Agreeing to do one simple action contains a hidden agreement to a ton of other things

And many more things like that.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will, if I have no other option. Say, finding a working VPN service in Russia ... sucks (mostly banned). I think I'll end up with a VDS and an https tunnel.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I can't rent a Ukrainian VDS, it might even get me to jail.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But in general, I hope your leadership's assholes fester and they die in horrible pain

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

You forgot the second part. And a flashy salute to go with it.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago

"Looks like you’re trying to be productive. Let me correct that for you"

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clippy didn’t hallucinate. I think Clippy wins

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Looks like you're writing a letter"

No I'm not, fuck off Clippy.

Turns out we just hadn't coined the term for computer intelligence being wrong as hallucinating yet.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know what, I think I remember that. You’re right. My bad

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Clippy still wins though because you could have him duck off.

[–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

And he had bespoke animations that were kinda charming

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and you could change him into something else. links the cat was mine.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

I think the cat used to be all over XP.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The concept of a desktop assistant has always been there.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And it's always been trash. That's how you know it will always be there in the future too.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 0 points 2 hours ago

It depends. A chatbot is kinda gimmicky, I agree. But stuff like ocr, reverse image seach from current screen, voice to text and probably more can be nicely combined into one assistant app. Google assistant used to come close to that, so did the old Cortana (although not quite as versatile). They didn't reinvent the wheel but they were genuinely convenient.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Exemplified by this being a rant in a video with sponsorships tacked on the description and comments. Probably in the video too, but obviously I'm not going to watch it.