this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
69 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8296 readers
170 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BOSTON (AP) — More than 120 cases, including some for assault on family members and police, were dismissed Tuesday in Boston, the latest fallout from a monthslong dispute over pay that has led public defenders to stop taking new clients.

At a mostly empty courtroom, Boston Municipal Court Chief Justice Tracy-Lee Lyons invoked the Lavallee protocol in dismissing case after case. It requires cases be dropped if a defendant hasn't had an attorney for 45 days and released from custody if they haven't had one for seven days. Tuesday was the first time it was invoked to drop cases, while suspects in custody have been released in recent weeks.

Most were for minor crimes like shoplifting, drug possession and motor vehicle violations.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can't pay public defenders?

Tax the goddamn billionaires.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They’ll sooner eliminate our right to counsel.

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

probly should be looking at eliminating the people who make that call then. this ain't how living in an organized society is supposed to work

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Most were for minor crimes like shoplifting, drug possession and motor vehicle violations.

Can we talk about WHY people are jailed for these “minor crimes”?

Yes, I know “why”, but I think we as a society need to talk about it more; very publicly and very LOUDLY!

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I like how they started the article with "assault on family members and police!" Then at the end it's in fact just mostly minor infractions

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I was called for MA jury duty yesterday. It was a smaller courthouse that only deals with misdemeanor cases. In MA they only use 6 person juries for these cases.

8 out of 21 jurors failed to show up for whatever reason. The judge tried to seat a jury for two separate trials, but after attorney challenges etc. he could only seat 5. We were then sent home, and I assume both of those cases have been rescheduled for later dates.

I hope those defendants get similar treatment if the state is unable to proceed with trials after multiple attempts to empanel juries…

[–] piefood@feddit.online 2 points 3 days ago

This is a good start, but why can people be held for 7 days? That seems crazy to me.

[–] Worthess@discuss.online 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

~~Just more shredding of the Constitution and due process..is it Great yet?~~

[–] Winthrowe@lemmy.ca 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’m not American but this feels like due process to me, certainly more so than allowing a trial to continue with no representation for the defendant.

[–] Worthess@discuss.online 6 points 4 days ago

You're correct. I was wrong in my assessment of the title.. this is actually a good thing..