this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

19367 readers
3 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mundane@feddit.nu 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Similarly, Rubino says web apps in Firefox will not use a minimal browser frame and will continue to show a main toolbar with address bar, extensions, bookmarks

But why, the whole purpose is to behave like a stand alone app.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

What the ...? Then why do it on the first place. Mozilla being stupid again.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A) Because they suffer from some kind of weird delusion that they will some day gain mote than single digit market share and then subsequently lose it because somebody hacked your grandmother‘s computer with a YouTube video that was running in full screen?

B) They are the worlds laziest coders and google paid them 20M a year to do nothing for… however many years it’s been.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn't say they're lazy. Quite the opposite in fact. They're just so under-resourced compared to Chrome, which has the benefit of a massive for-profit company backing it, in addition to a much larger range of third-party contributors (from Edge, Brave, Vivaldi, Opera, and more). They struggle to keep up with the fast pace at which web standards evolve.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because it’s low effort.

Less time and money spent on useless features like progressive web apps means more time can be spent on useful features like data harvesting, AI bullshit, and Facebook-approved advertising.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone -1 points 3 weeks ago

PWAs are not a useless feature. It's an incredibly useful and powerful set of web standards that allows sites to provide excellent user experiences more akin to what apps could provide, without users needing to go and download an app—which a lot of users, especially more privacy and security focused users—hate being asked to do.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If only they could allow extensions to work with iPhones.

[–] Malix@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

afaik, they really can't. IIRC apple only allows webkit browsers on the platform, so that alone rules out any and all extensions made for firefox. Firefox on iphones is essentially reskinned safari - and that's about it.

At least this is what internet has led me to believe, dunno, not an apple user.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

That’s not true anymore, you can use a custom engine now