this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

49162 readers
2066 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Kim Jong-un has introduced stricter laws in North Korea, sending both spouses in divorcing couples to labor camps for up to six months, with women often receiving longer sentences.

The regime views divorce as anti-socialist. Previously, only the spouse who initiated the divorce was punished.

Rising divorce rates since COVID-19 lockdowns have persisted despite public humiliation and threats of expulsion from the Korean Workers’ Party.

Reports indicate labor camps house dozens of divorcees, mostly in their late 30s, under harsh conditions.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, Radio Free Asia. The CIA cutout that successfully convinced a bunch of people that North Koreans were getting sent to labor camps for getting the wrong haircut.

[–] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why is this guy being down-voted? This is true by the CIAs own admission and it's the only source for the news article

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000846953.pdf

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

*from 1951-1955 when it was defunded. The modern iteration is far removed from this project and your line of argument is disingenuous at best.

[–] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ok? Can you try rereading what we both wrote and explain how that is at all relevant? The BBC is funded by the UK, does that inherently make it an unreliable source/ MI6 propaganda outlet? 🤡

[–] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why are you so angry? You ok dude?

If you don't understand how the RFA is still being funded by the USA in 2024 is relevant to where you said funding cease in 1955 then I don't know how to help. Unless you only read that article's headline and not even the first sentence... I'm just trying to provide sources for you since you thought the funding stopped.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That iteration, as I claimed literally exactly, was defunded in 1955. A quick Google search shows this.

[–] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This sources it's information from Radio Free Asian(RFA) which is a known propaganda arm of the USA... If you don't believe me the would you believe the CIA?

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000846953.pdf

Weird wonder why they need to fund propaganda against North Korea 🤔

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu -1 points 7 months ago

It was a cia mouthpiece from 1951 to 1955. Its modern iteration is far removed from that. While we could really get into the weeds about RFA as a source, the fact that you're citing random cia docs from 1953 without either realizing or indicating that the CIA program was defunded 2 years later leads me to believe you aren't interested in legitimate debate about this.