this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
767 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

74438 readers
2253 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 2 points 6 days ago

change.org doesn't do shit and it's bad for privacy and anonymity

[โ€“] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I am so tired of this shit... every year they try to do this shit again. Every year we again have to convince them not too. Then a year later they try again.

They will keep trying until they win. Instead of focusing on important things, they just want to push laws for more control. Even our representatives should KNOW that people don't want this.

I always wonder that. When we mass call and email to let them know they are wrong on something incredibly obvious. Do they go "oh wow we didn't know you didn't want us to know your private conversations or have a list of your favorite porn categories ๐Ÿ˜ฒ๐Ÿ˜ฒ๐Ÿ˜ฒ"? They should already know this.

[โ€“] Ulrich@feddit.org 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

They do know. They just don't care. It's not for you. It's to empower themselves. Even if it completely compromises/ends all private communications.

Dear Jack, where and why were you going to send photos of a child's genitals? Are you a pedophile? And you can't prove that this organ is yours and not a child's without shame...

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] Korkki@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Take note that there are lobbies pushing for these. Security state, police and religious fanatics wanting morality policing, also politicians who re afraid of popular upheaval.

[โ€“] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Maybe if politicians did what the people wanted, they wouldn't have to be afraid of an uprising against them... and if religious cunts would just stay in their churches and mind their own business...

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] bob_lemon@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The biggest lobby pushing this is companies like Thorn, who promise to provide (I.e. sell) the technology required to comply with such a law. It's literally just a business investment for them.

load more comments (1 replies)

They need control for the sake of control, there is nothing higher than absolute power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 70 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fucking hell. When does it stop? It's gotten shot down multiple times, so why do they keep trying? Do they see more of a chance now that we're getting more conservative views in the EP? It's good to see my country opposes it, but man.

[โ€“] palordrolap@fedia.io 44 points 1 week ago

It never stops. They keep trying and trying and trying until they get what they want. The only time things like this stop is if whatever wouldn't otherwise stop would inconvenience or take power from people in high places.

See: Brexit, where an advisory referendum was upheld, but we won't ever get another one to reverse it, even though that's a perfectly reasonable thing to want. Too many powerful people would stand to lose out.

[โ€“] cazzmaniandevil@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's only assumed the Netherlands opposes it because of the now fallen governments stance on it before. We all know that their campaign promises and 'regeerakkoord' are completly meaningless. So I'm still trying to call and emailing the dutch MEP's

[โ€“] ReluctantZen@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not confident either. There are definitely parties in our government that don't actually oppose this (like the VVD)

[โ€“] huppakee@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

I was relieved when I learned NL is opposing, but to be fair I was also a bit surprised. Don't think there is a good reason to be in favour of chat control, but kind of expect it from VVD, PVV and BBB anyway. They might even already want to expand it beyond child abuse to also include money launderers, immigrants and climate change protesters.

[โ€“] Australis13@fedia.io 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if this is petition is actually helpful. It is 4 years old and hasn't been updated to note the renewed focus on this legislation: https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/the-eu-could-be-scanning-your-chats-by-october-2025-heres-everything-we-know

[โ€“] Humanius@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Instead it might be more helpful to directly contact your representatives.

This website can help you figure out who they are, and help formulate an email send to them:
https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

(Obviously it is best to write your own response, or at least update the text to be your own, but it could be a good springboard)

[โ€“] MudMan@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

MEPs get elected with proportional representation on closed lists in a nation-wide single district.

Emailing 60 of them from an array of different parties with no official stance on the issue and no more of a direct relationship with you than with millions of other people is less direct political action and more spam. Pretty sure collective action would have a better chance.

[โ€“] Humanius@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'm not sure how contacting my representatives in the European Parliament over something that I am concerned about, would be spam.

I don't care what party they are from, or what part of the country they are from. They are still my representatives.
They sit there to represent the concerns of their constituents in parliament, and they cannot effectively do that if they do not know the concerns of their constituents.

If you have good ideas for collective action I'd love to hear them, but until then shooting an email can never hurt.

Edit: Just so there is no confusion, I don't think signing a four year old change.org petition is any more effective than directly contacting your MEPs

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] mat@linux.community 6 points 1 week ago

What kind of collective action are you thinking of?

[โ€“] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And it is on change.org, just some portal that no one has to take seriously

EU actually has a website to make real petitions, 8 think it was https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/_en

Though I think the proper action would be to contact your local politicians.

[โ€“] Humanius@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Citizen's Initiatives are great, but I'm not sure they are the right mechanism in this case.

They are meant to make parliament address a concern, and not to inform legislators how you feel about a law proposal that is already on the table. All a Citizen's Initiative does is force the European parliament to address a concern if a certain threshold of signatures is met. They will be doing that anyway when the law proposal is being voted on.

And on top of that, the time frame for a Citizen's Initiative is too long (over a year) to be a meaningful shield against Chat Control.

Contacting your representatives to the European Parliament is probably the best way forward at this point.

[โ€“] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Perhaps an initiative should be started that introduces a law banning such laws?

Also I still think contacting your politicians directly (and telling friends and family to do the same) will have better result than change.org petition, but there's nothing stopping people to do both.

It might be worth making a bid for legislation that requires that the public give up privacy to the government, those in government must make the same information public.

If they can read my messages, I should be able to read theirs.

[โ€“] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[โ€“] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm currently reading 1984 and already seeing references to it a bit everywhere. Same happened when I read hitchiker's guide to the galaxy.

[โ€“] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They are already rounding up anyone protesting against genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Educate friends and family on government surveillance, use privacy tools like Signal, VPN, Tor, etc. Help them set it up. You can do everyday actions to push back far more useful than signing a petition.

[โ€“] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Until they decide those tools are illegal as well. They solve a different problem. The government will ban things it cannot control so you have to fight governments directly, not just work around them.

[โ€“] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

We should vote and learn how to shoot. Sign petitions and learn how to use privacy tools.

When used with a bridge/Snowflake, Tor can bypass government censorship. It works in China for example.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm fully onboard, we have to fight this for everyone's sake.

Not completely related, but is this 100-mil-in-profits the best option to gather signatures?
Via wiki/Change.org:

Change.org is a website which allows users to create and sign petitions in an attempt to advance various social causes by raising awareness and influencing decision-makers. The site is a US-based for-profit company and claims to have 557 million users as of August 2025.

Isn't there a EU site to petition?
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/petitions/

[โ€“] somewa@suppo.fi 6 points 1 week ago

Going to sign it when it's there and not on some US site.

[โ€“] amju_wolf@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago

Didn't even know there was an EU website for that. Would be neat to have it there.

[โ€“] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The linked petition says:

The European Parliament MPs must vote AGAINST Chat Control legislation during EPlenary vote in June-August 2021.

It's not even up to date. And it only has 1.8k signatures.

load more comments (3 replies)

Here's a tool to quickly email you're representatives about chatcontrol. It's really easy to use and is generally great! https://fightchatcontrol.eu/#contact-tool

[โ€“] fozie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The European Union has begun to cross the border. I think they were inspired by United States and Signal and etc.

And how much energy will be spent on this... power for the sake of even more power, right?

[โ€“] MITM0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But it's for EU citizens only right ?

Oh so this was the real reason they wanted interconnected chat apps.

[โ€“] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

EU is a regulation superpower.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ