this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
426 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

71223 readers
4311 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Epic Games v. Apple judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers just ruled that, effective immediately, Apple is no longer allowed to collect fees on purchases made outside apps and blocks the company from restricting how developers can point users to where they can make purchases outside of apps.

. .

The judge also referred the case to the US attorney to review it for possible criminal contempt proceedings.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Hey maybe not fuckepic just this once.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbh for a broken clock Sweeney shows the right time remarkably often. Can't believe it, the bar for people like him is so low just being consistent is noteworthy lol

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 month ago

At least he never cosplayed team pleb tbh... Kinda doing his own "situation"

Rest of them is one of "us" hard working mavrevk or some shite

Still cunt tho

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's always fun when two terrible tech giants fight it out.

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Indeed, a little bit of intra-class war for them, for a change.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

Always fuck epic, but fuck Apple harder.

That there's a very narrow overlap of epic and general consumer/other devs interests doesn't make epic good.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

The worst person you know just made a great point

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Epic's most redeeming quality is their willingness to take bigger companies to court for their trash policies. Now if only we could get the FTC to do their jobs so Epic wouldn't have to...

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Yes but Apple did not build this system in the last 3 months, they've done it over the course of 3 decades.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lmao, the fuckepic and 'Tim Sweeney is a bastard man' sentiments were always wildly overblown.

The fact that anyone took Apple's side in this case (because the Epic game store paid for a couple exclusive games to try and break into the market) is laughably childish.

Apple literally rips off the entire world to the tune of billions of dollars a year through app store mafia extortion fees alone, let alone the rest of their anti-competitive bullshit.

Epic was just trying to break into the Apple / Google / Steam monopolies and made a couple unpopular / anti-consumer business moves on a couple games (all the while taking afar smaller cut of profits than any other store), meanwhile Apple has based their literal entire multi-decade business model on anti-consumer choices and done that for every single hardware and software device they sell you.

They are not remotely comparable. Epic was always fully in the right in their anti-monopoly legal battles.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I recommend liberal use of the concept of critical support

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Rogers also says that Apple “willfully” chose not to comply with her previous injunction from her original 2021 ruling

Why did it take them 4 years to enforce their own ruling?

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Apple has $50B+ in literal cash. Epic's entire revenue is under $7B/yr. Apple can afford to run Epic for decades on their cash reserves alone without impacting their bottom line.

That's why it took 4 years. I'm surprised Apple didn't bury them.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't understand what that has to do with anything? It doesn't cost either of them anything to enforce a ruling the court already made.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be clear, I'm not defending anyone here...

Apple likely delayed it multiple times.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They delayed the enforcement of a ruling? I don't think even they have that power.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

sure they can, all they had to do was ignore the ruling

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That doesn't delay the enforcement of the ruling.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The enforcement outlined in the OP?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No what I am asking you is what evidence of enforcement do you see anywhere here?

Apple was ordered by the courts to do something, they blatantly ignored it and doubled down. At no point it seems the courts were enforcing their initial ruling. It took the defendants to bring this back to court again. What's stopping Apple from not doing anything and ignoring the courts again?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No what I am asking you is what evidence of enforcement do you see anywhere here?

The evidence I see is the article linked in the OP.

It took the defendants to bring this back to court

If that happened, it's absent from the article in the OP.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is clearly NO enforcement in there... maybe we think "enforcement" are different things here

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know how you can not see enforcement. It's in the headline of the article.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Judge in Epic v. Apple bans Apple from charging commission on purchases made outside App Store"

That is what the judge ordered, who is forcing Apple to comply? forcing them to follow the ruling is the definition of "enforcement", not the ruling itself

And the reason I am second guessing is that the court had already ruled against Apple and they just ignored that and doubled down on the bad behaviour

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

who is forcing Apple to comply?

The...judge?

Whatever, this is a dumb argument.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

is it? because we are talking about the difference between a lawful society and anarchy.

Looks like you don't understand the point and now are getting defensive. Have a nice day bud

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes that's definitely what's happening and not that you don't understand and are trying to do a "gotcha" for internet points.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Internet points?... sorry, I did not realize you were 12

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, was I the one making dumb arguments for no reason? Oh no, that was you. And now you've further devolved to childish insults so you're going to be blocked. Goodbye.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh no!... anyways

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because the legal system is low moving even when major corporations aren't trying to delay things and you can bet that Apple did everything they could to slow down enforcement. I'm surprised it only took 4 years.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sweeney is also offering a “peace proposal” from Epic: “If Apple extends the court’s friction-free, Apple-tax-free framework worldwide, we’ll return Fortnite to the App Store worldwide and drop current and future litigation on the topic.”

Pretty sure this has a 0% chance of working.

[–] ozoned@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

rats scavenging for the last vestiges of growth in a world that hates them at the moment. Will the rats compromise or will they eat each other? My vote is on the latter.

Good. Operating systems should be neutral. The people who make them should not be allowed to dictate the terms that others use to interact with their platforms.