this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
516 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

70415 readers
3675 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_dude@lemm.ee 189 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I wonder who they will sell their data to

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 106 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Their creditors are going to be looking for recompense. So I feel like this is one of those times when we use the answer of "yes".

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

one of the cofounders is trying to buyout the company but I have to imagine they'll get outbid in the bakruptcy process.

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 55 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The Saudi investment fond. It's a perfect complement for that Pokemon Go data.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I hear they’re quite fond of it

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Some future Musk backed AI eugenic human embryo generator.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 27 points 2 months ago
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He's Looking for female incubators, of course they have to be white for him.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hasn’t he already had like a dozen “female incubators”?

This guy can’t be bothered to wear a condom or pull out before he jizzes his vile seed into whatever human dna compatible life form chooses to allow his penis entry?

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm led to believe Musk is incapable of intercourse due to a botched penis enlargement procedure, and at least most of his offspring are through AI (artificial insemination)

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Artificial Insemination AND surrogates actually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CitricBase@lemmy.world 141 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How on Earth did they manage to fuck this up?

They were the leading firm in a field where having the most data makes yours the most accurate tests. Their product sold for hundreds of dollars a pop, with practically zero marginal costs to run the tests. And they were really popular, selling like hotcakes.

It's insane just how astoundingly incompetent upper management can be sometimes.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 102 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They were being sued in the past for privacy breaches, they probably are in more trouble financially n than what's being reported?

Apparently they were just there to sell your genome data once you submit it, also there's no repeat customers since once you get your results you aren't going to get another one.

This article explains it better"https://www.standard.co.uk/news/science/23-and-me-dna-test-collapse-b1213426.html"

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Good article. It was fundamentally not a good business model. You have to acquire new customers constantly just to keep the lights on, it’s unsustainable. Adding on top of that the expectations from investors to grow every year, and the collapse we see now is guatanteed.

I see they tried to diversify, that could have helped, but without a recurring revenue stream at the core of your business, you cannot become the big company they wanted to be.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

i was comparing it to THERANOS, more or less it was a scam from the start. Having someone like british pharm company glaxo-kline smith access to data without consent is just asking for trouble.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, just terrible management. They could have just made good money, but no, there has to be more. So excessive greed at any price - now it's just bankruptcy. But I'm sure that won't bother the senior management: they've already put their millions in a safe place and will simply move on. The next company that needs their outstanding leadership is bound to come along...

[–] meliante@lemm.ee 40 points 2 months ago (4 children)

No returning customers, due to the nature of the business. It's dead from the start.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 months ago

I'm not sure what would make you think the "customers" for an enormous DNA database were the people providing the DNA.

Those people were just paying to be the product.

[–] CitricBase@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It can't be just that, right? There are loads of successful products that any given person only ever buys once.

[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] Captain_Buddha@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's easy! 1: Coffin 2: Headstone 3: septic tank 4: bad parachute 5: cemetery plot

There's, uh, a bit of a theme with these though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] asap@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Come on. Any "buy it for life" product will fall in that category. Safety razor for example.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Companies that sell safety razors (or whatever buy-once product) probably also do lots of other stuff to diversify.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Ah, you mean the original "razor and blades" business model that ensures repeat customers.

(Yes, I'm aware that many people who use safety razors these days are not necessarily buying from brands that make both the razor and the blades, I am such a person myself, I'm somewhat joking on that)

But even in the realm of "buy it for life" items, you can still end up with repeat customers. Maybe you want a second razor for your travel toiletry bag, or to keep in your second bathroom. Maybe you just see one that looks cooler, or the handle is more ergonomic, or the way you change the blade seems more convenient.

And BIFL items still do sometimes get lost, stolen, given away, thrown out, or sometimes even broken and need to be replaced.

And unless the world's population starts shrinking, there will always be new shavers hitting puberty who will eventually need their own razor.

With a DNA test, unless you're questioning paternity or testing for specific genetic traits like cancer risk and such, once your parents have taken a test, you and your siblings don't really need to, you know what your parents are so you know what you are.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A headstone, grave, urn, wedding dress, and any outfit used in a religious ceremony.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

I know several people that have bought more than one wedding dress.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't. It's only happened to me once.

[–] calabast@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

A person is born every day.

You are not born every day.

Seems clear that you must not be a person.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It happened to me yesterday and now I hear it only happens once?

Smh my head.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Smh my head.

Currying won’t save you

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right, but the data you get from that test is pretty broad. One test will create a background for an entire family. You only need to do one for one child. Or if both parents have one, or a sibling of both parents have done one, the children of that pair also no longer needs a test to see their background.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

It's not just about background though. Could also filter the results for genetic markers of medical conditions, something that may differ between individuals.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

People that would presumably already know their lineage since their parents already took the test.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

true but after the enormous initial boom they would have reached an equilibrium of a small trickle. the question is if that small trickle is enough to sustain a company on its own, so apparently not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MinorLaceration@lemmy.world 101 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Reminder that you can download and save your data locally then revoke your consent agreements and delete your data. Who knows if it will actually be deleted though.

Edit: Also revoke your consent to store your sample if you allowed that.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah good luck with that.

I doubt they'd actually delete data now. Who are you going to sue if they don't? They're bankrupt and they'll just pull a "oh we forgot to delete it!"

They need these samples and data to be sold off to pay off a lot of groups so I honestly don't believe they'll delete anything

If your brother or even cousin did a test it's about good enough to be applied to you too for a lot of cases so yay, so much fun about human DNA databases now being available to the highest bidder.

Who would bid? Maybe America's new Nazi's would like an insight in their racial purity? So many fun ideas!

That company should be burned down to the ground

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

That company should be burned down to the ground

Seems like they did a pretty good job of burning themselves to the ground.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Pepperidge Farm remembers

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 64 points 2 months ago

US people should get ready to be denied even more healthcare

[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, I've always been curious what a ruthless person would do with all that DNA data. I'll finally find out.

[–] tooting_lemmy@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Church of Latter Day Saints will probably buy it. They believe they can convert the dead.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They can’t possibly be that stupid. I’m sure they have more sinister plans for these geneology databases. My first guess would be blackmail. But I’m guessing they have a ton of other evil ideas.

[–] tooting_lemmy@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LDS has a ton of money. They already have some kind of deal with ancestry.com and own familysearch.com.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah even before those websites existed, they were collecting all kinds of files on people. Like late 80s, early 90s. Warehouses full of paper records.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Easy. Health insurers will pay top dollar for it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

I am so glad i never used the kit my dad got me. I had a suspicion this would happen sooner or later

load more comments
view more: next ›