this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
837 points (98.0% liked)

linuxmemes

27766 readers
1928 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Cross-posted from "It's that time again" by @Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com in !linux_memes@programming.dev


    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 184 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)
    [–] FishFace@lemmy.world 64 points 2 weeks ago

    This is what I concluded in the end...

    [–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    I do at home, can't choose at work (but we keep pushing the people in charge)

    [–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    I heard of imposing operating systems (which I'm also against*), but never specific distros or DEs.

    * at least for technical people who know what they're doing and wont spam the IT support

    [–] menemen@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

    If it is a larger company that defintly would make maintenance easier.

    [–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    My company started enforcing Macs this year but as a special exception they'll let us use Windows or Ubuntu. No other distro and the CTO must still authorize it.

    The reason? Meet some vague security guidelines that the PR team wants us to be able to say we meet, by forcing us to run a spying agent to ensure our OS is up-to-date so I'm not vulnerable to leaking data I don't even have access to. But the tool doesn't support anything that updates frequently.

    I had just built a brand new laptop for work and I refused to sully it with Ubuntu so I installed it on an old desktop and just been putting zero effort into fixing Ubuntu shit. Wifi often can't handle meetings, none of my cameras worked ootb - also can't go to the office anymore since I can't carry the desktop there.

    Still a year away from being able to request the company buys me a machine again (last time there were no conditions for it) - but I don't intend to stay here until then.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Emi@ani.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    What distro do you use with it? So far I liked mint with cinnamon but looking to switch my main PC to Linux and ditch windows on October 23rd.

    [–] Tiempo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago

    With KDE, you can go with Fedora if you like something "closer" to mint experience. I use it with Endeavor OS and I'm very happy

    [–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 weeks ago

    EndeavourOS

    ☺️such a joy

    [–] h3ll3rsh4nks@ani.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I've been enjoying CachyOS myself lately.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] rozodru@piefed.social 67 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    The other week had a GNOME dev reply to a thread of mine on mastodon stating that the users desire to select a default terminal emulator was an "edge case" and it was beneath GNOME. then all the GNOME fanboys came out to his defense.

    It's an insufferable DE and community.

    [–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

    As insufferable as KDE users always shitting on gnome?

    I've generally found gnome users just use it. New KDE releases don't have gnome fanboys bashing it, etc.

    But new GNOME releases? Directly the opposite.

    Really wish people would just chill.

    [–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

    I've generally found gnome users just use it

    lol

    [–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yeah, there is way less hate and mockery towards KDE. Now let's think why that might be

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

    As insufferable as KDE users always shitting on gnome?

    This 100%

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] ampy@discuss.online 52 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I like how GNOME looks and functions for the most part, but I really wish the world provide more options instead of whatever design philosophy they think needs enforced.

    [–] palordrolap@fedia.io 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    Obligatory mention that Linux Mint's dev team have forked some GNOME apps into their own XApps* project. Part of the reason is so that those apps retain the user's window manager's look and feel rather than GNOME's enforced interface design. That might even be the main reason, but they also throw in their own improvements to the apps where they feel they're necessary.

    They've not yet forked all GNOME-looking applications in Mint, and I'm not even sure they intend to, but it's a noble effort.

    * Yes, it really is called that. Like I've said before, they probably could have chosen a better name, but they chose it before Wayland was a real threat and before Twitter got lobotomised.

    [–] Arcka@midwest.social 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    X referred to a display server since long before Twitter was born.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Best_Jeanist@discuss.online 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I don't use gnome because I don't think a desktop use interface should be designed for iPads

    I've got Gnome installed on a tablet PC. It's not good there, either.

    [–] alecsargent@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    When I first used Linux I loved Gnome for the intuitiveness and simplicity but I did not like the same thing you were saying. I guess it makes a good desktop for tablets lol.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] ibot@feddit.org 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

    I think Gnome is the most beautyful Desktop out there. But it's UX drives me crazy. I tried it a few times but never could get used to it. I always needed extensions to customize it to my needs. But that's also what I want to avoid because extensions might break in the future. Therefore, Gnome is simply not the right Desktop for me.

    But I'm happy for everyone who likes to use Gnome. The great thing about Linux: We have a choice!

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    I'm having a great time on GNOME, even without any extensions at all!

    [–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

    That is sort of the thing with Gnome. If you like it it's great, but if you don't there is nothing you can do to really change it. Like I think it's okay, but there are things I don't like and it is just too much effort to try to adapt it to my preferences.

    load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] overload@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Good for you. I broke my GNOME Pop OS build, I assume because of extensions and pop not updating anything for 2 years. GNOME goes against the Linux philosophy of user customisation.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

    I used it for a while, because KDE was so buggy. Gnome gives you no functionality and it's still buggy, though.

    Once KDE improved I switched to it, though

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

    There are so many things the Linux kernel project does just right. One of them is "never break user space".
    Unfortunately most projects completely fail to get why this is important.
    I think one of the worst examples is the enormous setback it caused when Python was "upgraded" from 2 to 3, which meant breakage of huge amounts of libraries, that were never fixed, and was extremely detrimental to Python.

    The kernel respects user-space, but actual user front ends do not!?!?!
    KDE generally does the same when they upgrade to new versions of QT.

    [–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 weeks ago

    The kernel equivalent of shell extensions would be kernel modules. Out of tree modules break all the time. There's no stable in-kernel ABI, just like there's no guarantee that shell internals never change.

    [–] cole@lemdro.id 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    python 2 to 3 is actually an enormous change

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    GNOME is great but people recommending it to beginners need to make it clear that there is only minor customization, and that major customization / extensions will cause headaches.

    Plasma is highly customizable out of the box. It's personal preference in the end of course.

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] Decq@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

    This is why I stopped using Gnome. After every update most of my extensions stopped working. Some took ages to get up to date or were abandoned. And there was no simple way to enable all extensions that the update disabled, having to manually enable them one by one. Maybe that has changed now? It's been yearsnow... Not that I would go back anyway, tiling managers is where it's at.

    [–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

    Dunno, I saw GNOME 3 run like molasses on my PC, went "ok, this might be lost cause", went with LXDE and then XFCE, and now I'm like "if it's a beefy proper PC I'll go with KDEPlasma and if it's, like, very obsolete system I'll, dunno, go with XFCE".

    GNOME is just opinionated. I get it, it was kinda vaguely modeled after Mac OS, which is kinda an opinionated desktop environment, but the thing is, it's even more opinionated than Mac OS ever was. The thing about (early!) Mac OS X was "hey, we have this slick desktop environment but also some power user features you might want to use. But we're not forcing you to!" (Kinda like GNOME 2!) ...GNOME has been kinda sweeping those under the rug, in my opinion.

    [–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

    Which is why Plasma is better

    [–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    We all got choices, that's what I like about Linux. KDE seems to run great for most people, for me it always seems to bug out and act super janky (the panel editor in particular would bug out and crash constantly, I could never get the damn thing to where I liked it). If it was more stable for me I'd probably use it, I love customizing my system. I've tried making it work a few times, never seems to click.

    GNOME's extensions may break on updates from time to time but my day to day experience with it is much nicer. While more rigid it's a lot more polished and doesn't crash out on me just using the interface. I like the layout of it. I'm glad KDE works for so many of you guys, but I'll stick with GNOME until a better option comes around.

    That said, if anyone has a better suggestion for a desktop environment I'm all ears.

    load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] eleijeep@piefed.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    It really is a shame that they force you to update to the new version. If only there was some way to continue using the existing Gnome version until the extensions have been updated by their authors.

    [–] jj4211@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    If you want to update your software broadly, it's a pain in the ass if you need to try to hold gnome and only gnome back.

    And many of those extensions get abandoned after the authors get tired of the treadmill of having to redo stuff they already did.

    [–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago

    The funniest thing about this is that, according to a Gnome dev, they decided to not create APIs or anything and keep relying on extensions to monkey-patch code into the gnome-shell process to ensure "developer freedom".

    It's completely mad. I uninstalled Gnome after it crashed on me multiple times, taking either my work or (once) my game process with it.

    On KDE at least IF the shell crashes it doesn't cause all my programs to become unavailable too, I can save whatever I was doing. Its UI/UX is arguably a mess, but at least it god damn works reliably and doesn't come as barren wasteland with missing base features. I would love to love Gnome, but god damn it hell no.

    load more comments (8 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] eta@feddit.org 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

    I use Gnome with extensions and are quite happy. But it's true. the worst part is when they break after a new version comes out.

    Fun Fact: You can just add the new version number to some file (can't remember which) for each extension and many of them work just fine. It's from a list of version numbers where they decide whether an extension can be run on a given Gnome Version. And new versions are not automatically added to that list.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

    There is literally one working todo thingy extension for GNOME. KDE has one included.

    [–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

    Yeah I very much like dislike the culture of Gnome... maybe I'll try something else someday. KDE isn't for me but Cosmic maybe.

    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί