this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
305 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

2772 readers
387 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am sure this article has been shared before, however I wanted to have a look at this topic.
The articles short summary is this:

All 25 car brands we researched earned our *Privacy Not Included warning label – making cars the worst category of products that we have ever reviewed

I am currently driving a 2014 Ford Fiesta which just has a radio with a CD player and Bluetooth. I do not need more than that in a car.

The reason I am looking at all is that that the Fiesta does not belong to me and the friend owning it will be moving out in a bit, so I kinda need another one.

There seems to be one brand that is not as bad as the other ones (but still bad): Renault; mozilla's review...
Maybe I will have a look at their cars.

What do you guys think? Stick to older used cars and not use an EV or look at which of the manufacturers have the least bad privacy policy?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I’m confused here, if cars are not connected to the internet how else are they broadcasting the data? Or is it collected during maintenance and if so what do mechanics care about your sexual activity.

Edit: Reading through the comments there are 3G/4G/LTE/5G bands in the cars? Who is paying for the cellular service then?


I don’t drive nor care about cars so this isn’t my wheelhouse obviously.

I pay for a 5g wireless number from AT&T. Not sure exactly what my Mustang is selling. But I do get warnings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

How is the old Zoe there? It even asks for consent for maps data.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Detroit already knows where all your dogging spots are. Who did you think you were meeting there?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›