this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
587 points (94.3% liked)

Political Weirdos

1148 readers
66 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They don't care and take everything for granted, that's what stupid people do. Also they think 5 min in advance.

See the people who voted for Trump and then were shocked that they or their relatives get deported. Likewise here: "the bad stuff is for other people and not me“ or some version of that.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but their pastor said liberals eat babies. So deal's off.

[–] Houseman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

They are trained from a very young age to obey and never question authority. It's pretty much part of the religion.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (18 children)

Isn’t that because of progressivism? Liberalism is free markets and small government and all that shit. Stop letting the lib shits claim these wins.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago

...you can have an abortion if you want to not have a baby yet....oh actually you don't have this one anymore.

[–] Packet@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Vote

New Zealand, Finland and the USSR were the first to make that a reality. Spearheaded by trade union movements and communists.

Work

The Soviet Union was the first country to establish legal equality in pay and employment for women, and then followed by the PRC and the wide amount of time of socdem movement in the nordic countries.

File for divorce

France was the first, with the french revolution. Then came the Soviet Union and after it the PRC.

Buy a credit card

To be honest this is absurd, but indeed the US was the first as far as I can remember. Having the right to drown in debt is good i guess.

Buy a home or a car

US and UK did indeed pioneer that, but it was with more focus on married women. Actual acts focused just on women were implemented by the Soviet Union with collective property and gender equality laws.

Driver's license

There were little to no formal bans for that, social stigma was and is real though. Still an issue.

Pregnant and not get fired

USSR pioneered that in 1918, with labor codes protecting working mothers. Followed by the nordic socdem movement and the US only in the 1978

Husband can go to jail for beating you

USSR again, was the first to criminalize domestic battery in 1918. Although enforced unevenly it was legally punishable. Western Europe and the Northern America started it in 1970s with implementation continued to 1990s.

Many of the achievements listed are not of liberalism or neoliberalism, they were achievements of activists and unions working in a group to protect their collective interests. In many of the cases it was the Soviet Union with the revolution spearheading these rights, because the revolution itself was started by working class women. The nordics followed with their own social democrat feminist movement. In many things the PRC came before the neoliberal states in achievements of women's rights, and that is a state that was ravaged by war and imperialism for years. Liberalism gave little to nothing, it maintained the hierarchies, and silenced the movement. Both democrats and republicans both do not care about women's rights. They are both parties of the same right wing on the fascist eagle.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So this is almost definitely referring to social liberalism, not economic/classical liberalism which is an entirely different thing. Some ideas of social liberalism overlap with progressivism and even socialism.

The US happens to have two parties that are liberals - but it's two different varieties of liberalism. Republicans are classical liberals whereas democrats for the most part are social liberals

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Liberalism means so many things around the world, it's a shit show.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

What exactly could the women vote for in the USSR, or anyone for that matter?

I guess they can vote even today in Russian 😂

I will give you the feminism stuff embedded in the socialist system, that's true...

[–] RougeEric@lemmy.zip 84 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Arguably, it's at least in large part the efforts of socialists, communists, and radical feminists that made some of these possible. But decades of vilification in the USA have made them virtually invisible to the general population.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Liberalism is not the reason for almost any of these but radicals working against not within the system.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 16 points 2 days ago

Liberals taking credit for others’ praxis is their praxis.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

MAGA women do not want all women to express to those rights.

MAGA women want to control who represses those rights.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (9 children)

... You don't buy a credit card.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Optional@fash.world misspelling “radicalism” for “liberalism” is peak liberal Illusory Truth Effect.

Get more radical, law-boot licker.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

LOL liberalism.
American dumb

load more comments
view more: next ›