AntiBullyRanger

joined 2 months ago
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Checking🫣🪟

yep, nope, still happening

Not interested in state sponsored genocides.

Also, what's with your starlight tours?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

It's extremely hard to be charitable online, when you have instances like these:

I'm sorry that I cannot “be kind” to the intolerant.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 6 points 5 days ago

NAH, they neod to scrub the databases retroactively, including all the other ones still open.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 5 days ago

John Queally needs to get familiarized with the scientific act of digressive victimhood already.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 7 points 5 days ago

Quite literally it. We even coined the scientific name for it already!

Digressive Victimhood.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -1 points 6 days ago

Cults are younger than human history.

Don't fall for the monopoly on violence.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How can non-enforceable laws be laws?

Your majesty, the peasants are rebelling, they have overtaken the army, what do we do?

Kim Jong Un suing and winning his case

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

You get sued no matter what authoritarian country your tools get used in, it doesn't mean Signal Technology Foundation has to comply with French law, as they are not beholden by their jurisdiction. That is why I used North Korea as an e.g.: Kim Jong Un can't sue the world.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Privacy and encryption are inalienable human rights, even in authoritarian hells like North Korea. There's is no reason to comply with bs laws.

If you don't see mocking a fascist government as a form of protest, I'm not so sure how I can help you see the harm in leaving.

That last paragraph is the problem, they know they are a line of defense for many vulnerable people in France. So leaving them to their own devices is a form of complicit acceptance.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Back when I was younger and naïve, I would Nicolas Cage OP.

I'm now more mature and open minded, and I can say I wholesomely agree with @Zak@lemmy.world’s statement ITT.

Technologists have very little patience for people that are technologically illiterate. And when you're fighting to liberate people against corporations that send hitlists against you, patience runs faster. My hope is that people like OP can empathize that while yes, public technologies can be harmful and downright hostile, they can take their time to comprehend concepts technologist took their time to write down and document for.

If you want private conversations with peers, it must be encrypted, it must be forward secret, and it must be authenticatable.

XMPP, SimpleXchat, & Signal are the only three that fit these specifications.

I have the first two (check my bio👈😎👈), the latter I do not trust.

view more: next ›