this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
558 points (99.3% liked)

You Should Know

46457 readers
84 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 119 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Emails don't need to work like text messages. Why are reactions even a thing for them?

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 100 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I like the idea - I don't want to send you an email back, here's a thumbs up to show I've received it.

I hate the execution because I get an email telling me you reacted to my email.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

depends on the client; in outlook you just get an alert saying someone reacted.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Reactions like this work in closed ecosystems (Whatsapp / Facebook) where everyone is on the same client or via open standards that is baked into the spec of the protocol. E-Mail has neither of these, which is why it's so egregious that a whole email is being sent with 4-16 bytes of actual content itself.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

Internet Standards.

The things MS tried to extend-and-extinguish the Web when it was just barely born. Remember campaigns "best in any browser" ?

We almost didn't have an open Internet.

Fuck you specifically, MicroSoft

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure what you even want then. If an email can't be delivered you should get a kickback notifications saying it can't be delivered. Though, that may depend on the email service.

Ans if you're effectively looking for a read-receipt, I'm not sure why you wouldn't want to be notified of it. I don't want to have to manually check anything to see if there is new information to look at. An email may be overkill, but 🤷.

[–] pocker_machine@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Not everyone wants read receipt notifications for everything. It is much easier if it is manual just like message reactions. So reaction is the best solution here. But as the user stated, its execution is not the best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If it isn't the first email you've ever exchanged, why can't you just plan for the fact that they got your email and if they drop the ball the fault is not yours?

"I'm sending you this thing, if anything is wrong please let me know; otherwise I will assume all is agreed and we can move forward."

No response required. Stay off my lawn, don't send me an email or a text or anything else that just says "ok". Maybe I'm showing my age...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

our secretary uses a meme to end her daily attendance email, so I give her a laughing face when its a good one. She started it on an email I made a joke in. So I just recipicate it. I also like the thumbs up on emails that are FYI type things

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 27 points 7 months ago (4 children)

i like reactions, for the most part. its nice to do an acknowledgement without having to write out a whole reply so the other person knows i received it.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 22 points 7 months ago

Nope. Straight to jail

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Back when I was a whee whippersnapper, we would click the reply button and type, "Ok", or "thanks", or "Ok, thanks", or "gotcha", or ":-)", or "+1", or "LOL", or "LMFAO", or ..... I mean, it was onerous, with those extra couple clickity clicks and tappity taps, but somehow we managed.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If you use the newer versions of Outlook it has some inane one-shot reply buttons you can click that is based on the content of the previous email and presumably some model built on you.

My work computer uses Outlook, and it usually has options like these

  • Gotcha, thanks
  • Brill, thank you
  • I will do that, thanks

At my old workplace though, one of our customers would always respond with a couple of letters. Could be something like

Customer:
Hi. Could you update thing on website?

Us:
Hello!
Absolutely. We've rolled out the update, and you should be able to see it now.
Hope all is well over there. :)

Customer:
T M

Where T is short for "Thank you" and M is short for "Mary"

Ah. They were fantastic. Frustrating but awesome people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

same reason there is a poop emoji in a "professional" messaging app… MS is idiotic and out of ideas

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

MS with that "hello, fellow kids" energy.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eRac@lemmings.world 74 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Outlook's own reaction handling is terrible. It adds the reaction icon to the email, but it doesn't mark it as unread or bring it to the top. The next day, I get an email with all the reactions for the day.

"Available for a meeting at 9 tomorrow?" 👍

Then the daily digest shows up at 9 and the meeting was never scheduled.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m confused as to why it wasn’t scheduled? Were you the one who was scheduling it, or were you reaction-replying to an invite, anticipating that the reaction emoji would accept the invitation and put the meeting on your calendar?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They sent a mail to check someone's availability and didnt send the invite because they got no response.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpicyTaint@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago (4 children)

My work uses outlook and I still get a whole fuckin email saying "Dipshit has reacted 👍" and it's extremely irritating. I'll need to remember to turn off reactions on Monday.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 7 months ago

I need a shirt that says "dipshit has reacted 👍"

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 months ago

I have a coworker that responds to everything with emojis. Teams messages. Emails. Everything. Even if it’s not relevant to him or directed at him. He always does it. I want to hit him with a chair.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I will say, it's practical for everyone using the same system. Sometimes it's nice to acknowledge an email without having to respond to it

And when I had my school account, they'd send out phishing alerts of what to look out for. Those emails would be spammed with crying laughing emojis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] The_v@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I disabled it as soon as they were launched. I also disabled the quick reply, reactions, and to text messages etc.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hey let’s all change what we do and how we do it to accommodate the monopoly Microsoft. Again.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 12 points 7 months ago

Don't forget to add a string to your wifi ssid so Microsoft doesn't index it.

And if you don't want Google to index it you need to use a different string, and it must be placed at the end.

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 7 months ago

This how I learn that reactions to e-mail are a thing now? I'm not sure what to even think.

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

good thing i dont talk to anyone and i only get emails from companies, spam, and appointments. this would annoy the fuck outta me.

[–] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I got a thumbs-up reply to an email once and immediately looked up how to block it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Seamonkey does this by default, took me ages to work out what the fuck this "J" people kept leaving on emails was

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The real stupid thing here is that a header has to be added to disable reactions. Why didn't Microsoft just use a header to enable them? I mean make it opt in instead of opt out. Then they can use that header in all their Outlook shit and everyone else can go on with their day not worrying about it. So stupid, but not sure what I expected from Microsoft.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 5 points 7 months ago

If you make a 'feature' opt-in, 3 people will use it, so the person who added it would have to work much harder to justify their paycheck. If you make everyone use your 'feature' by default, you can say 'look how many people use the feature I added,' while actually pointing at the number of people who didn't turn off the feature according to the ~~spyware~~ metrics.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I fucking guarantee you that Microsofts reasoning for this feature is to again force people to use their shit software.

Oh, don't want those spam mails? Yeaaaahhh, you need to switch to outlook for that.

Or, you know, just block domains that use Microsoft email

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 12 points 7 months ago

Or, you know, just block domains that use Microsoft email

I'm guessing you probably don't realize how many organizations host their email with Microsoft.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 7 months ago

Surprise, you get the spam even if you use Outlook.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Reactions are great. They allow for feedback without adding to the pile of email everyone already gets.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

i agree reactions can be useful, but adding them to email the way Microsoft has is obnoxious for recipients using any client other than theirs. and, i think this is probably their intention: receiving an email reaction in a client that doesn't render it as a reaction feels wrong and MS probably hopes this will encourage some people to switch to using Outlook.

the right way to add reactions to email would be to make it opt-in (and also not a vendor-specific header but instead something which aims to become a standard): clients should only allow reactions to messages which contain a header signaling that the sender supports receiving them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

but email is used specifically for receipts, otherwise messaging would be used

I realize that this is up to the user and that choice is great, so the issue comes down to implementation. and as a user... I find out far after the fact that somebody reacted to my email because outlook doesn't show me those notifications in a timely manner, nor am I going to look for them because I consider that a chat feature and Microsoft already sends me enough notification spam

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“Thanks.”

One of my most hated email message bodies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Coming from a neurodivergent: fuck Microsoft for doing this. It does not go along well with how email should work, makes it confusing for several reasons and shits over a lot of expectations.

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

According to their history, this is the extend part.

[–] Regna@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Thankfully we’ve not yet upgraded from Outlook 2016… saving this for if we ever do.

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 7 points 7 months ago

Thankfully I haven't seen this, but if I did, the feature I'd be inclined to use is called "block sender".

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›