SorteKanin

joined 2 years ago
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 1 points 18 hours ago

Laying the matter truly bare would be:

To be fair, there’s always been something deeply wrong ~~with how most people understand the universe.~~

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m actually most concerned with the IP leaking

I'm curious, what is it about IP leaking that concerns you? I've been thinking about it lately but I have a hard time seeing why it's a problem.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 1 day ago

Why is this posted in the fediverse community? I get that you think this is important, but this is an international community and many here have no way to influence American politics. It's also just off topic.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 1 day ago

Communities should be linked at least

Who decides what communities are linked? You'd need some kind of central authority to do that, but that would break decentralization.

Multiple options for the same thing is good and should be accepted as normal. It's only on the internet that we have learned to think otherwise.

Wouldn't it be weird if you only had one supermarket option to go to? I mean yea super markets mostly have the same stuff, but there's a good reason not to have monopolies.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 15 points 1 day ago

To be fair, almost all instances started like this.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Isn't the problem with banning ads that you'd just gets "ads" that aren't marked as such? Like, ads are still going to happen, they just won't be clearly marked cause that would be illegal.

EDIT: Would love to hear how the downvoters would enforce an advertisement ban. What happens when an influencer randomly endorses a brand and then that brand also just coincidentally happens to give the influencer a "generous donation" or perhaps a life-time usage coupon?

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 6 days ago

[PieFed] seems to be strongly opinionated about how people should behave and it kinda gives me an icky feeling about its culture

Yea, I get this same feeling. It's not that I mind that culture or being mindful of how people behave and such - I just don't think that is the domain of the software to decide. Individual instances can decide that for themselves, but the software shouldn't influence that kind of thing, I feel.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 36 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Well, that might be the cause. Kinda scary you get recommendations like that just due to no history.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 46 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Wow your YouTube recommendations are very different from mine.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago

But it doesn't block votes, so their users will still influence your feed.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago

Do be aware of the limitations of user blocking though.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 7 points 1 week ago

Username checks out?

 

I recently discovered an interesting (and somewhat disappointing, as we'll find later) fact. It may surprise you to hear that the two most upvoted comments on any Lemmy instance (that I could find at least) are both on Feddit.dk and are quite significantly higher than the next top comments.

The comments in question are:

  1. This one from @bstix@feddit.dk with a whopping 3661 upvotes.
  2. This one from @TDCN@feddit.dk with 1481 upvotes.

These upvote counts seems strange when you view them in relation to the post - both of the comments appear in posts that do not even have 300 upvotes.

Furthermore, if you go on any instance other than Feddit.dk and sort for the highest upvoted comments of all time, you will not find these comments (you'll likely instead find this one from @Plume@lemmy.blahaj.zone).

Indeed, if you view the comments from another instance (here and here), you will see a much more "normal" upvote count: A modest 132 upvotes and a mere 17 upvotes, respectively.

What's going on?


Well, the answer is Mastodon. Both of these comments somehow did very well in the Mastodon microblogging sphere. I checked my database and indeed, the first one has 3467 upvotes from Mastodon instances and the second one has 1442 upvotes from Mastodon instances.

Notice how both comments, despite being comments on another post, sound quite okay as posts in their own right. A Mastodon user stumbling upon one of these comments could easily assume that it is just another fully independent "toot" (Mastodon's equivalent of tweet).

Someone from Mastodon must have "boosted" (retweeted) the comments and from there the ball started rolling - more and more people boosted, sharing the comments with their followers and more and more people favorited it. The favorites are Mastodon's upvote equivalent and this is understood by Lemmy, so the upvote count on Lemmy also goes up.

Okay, so these comments got hugely popular on Mastodon (actually I don't know if 3.4k upvotes is unusual on Mastodon with their scale but whatever), but why is there this discrepancy between the Lemmy instances then? Why is it only on Feddit.dk that the extra upvotes appear and they don't appear on other instances?

The reason is the way that Mastodon federates Like objects (upvotes). Like objects are unfortunately only federated to the instance of the user receiving the Like, and that's where the discrepancy comes from. All the Mastodon instances that upvoted the comments only sent those upvotes directly to Feddit.dk, so no other instances are aware of those upvotes.

This feels disappointing, as it highlights how Lemmy and Mastodon still don't really function that well together. The idea of a Lemmy post getting big on Mastodon and therefore bigger on Lemmy and thus spreading all over the Fediverse, is unfortunately mostly a fantasy right now. It simply can't really happen due to the technical way Mastodon and Lemmy function. I'm not sure if there is a way to address this on either side (or if the developers would be willing to do so even if there was).

I personally find Mastodon's Like sharing mechanism weird - only sharing with the receiving instance means that big instances like mastodon.social have an advantage in "gathering Likes". When sorting toots based on favorites, bigger instances are able to provide a much better feed for users than smaller instances ever could, simply because they see more of the Likes being given. This feels like something that encourages centralization, which is quite unfortunate I think.


TL;DR: The comments got hugely popular on Mastodon. Mastodon only federates upvotes to the receiving instance so only Feddit.dk has seen the Mastodon upvotes, and other instances are completely unaware.

view more: next ›