this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
836 points (97.4% liked)

Today I Learned

25786 readers
875 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 3 days ago (19 children)

I don't know why homeless people don't break into every unused house and squat in it, especially in the winter.

Eventually, that's what's going to happen, as our society switches from a Trickle Down Economy to a Robin Hood Economy (take from the Rich, give to the poor). If the MAGAs and Dems don't want that, then they better get busy establishing a Trickle UP Economy.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Most of these houses are not in downtowns of big cities but in rural towns that are far away from everything. Not to mention, just because a unit is vacant that doesn't mean it's not being used.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] notaviking@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The housing market crash, I believe was a lost opportunity. When the US government had to bail out banks, why did it not ask for those houses that went belly up. Could have started a social housing aid, here it could sell luxury homes to buy low cost housing to give to its most vulnerable citizens. It paid for those houses using people's tax dollars, why not use it for the benefit of the people

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

because that's socialism.

the concept of federal public housing was basically made illegal in the 90s by the welfare reform acts.

the federal government can't do this by law. legally it is not allowed to increase the number of public housing units beyond those that existed in 1998. it's called the Faircloth amendement.

[–] notaviking@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bailing out companies is also not capitalism, ideally should have left them then to go bankrupt

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

It's completely written by AI, but ChatGPT makes a good point.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Jesus. I remember the figure being like, 10. Which was already absurd.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

11 was the number I remembered it being. Been quoting that for years. Jesus Christ, it's more than doubled. Wtaf is wrong with humanity

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 13 points 3 days ago

Today you learned something, from your own blog, in a post you have reposted from over a year ago?

it's it a solution or more that they're are abandoned areas with empty houses in places with no jobs or investments which aren't for for a community?

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I say it is OK to own 2 houses.

But you guys should make it a crime to own more than 2.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (10 children)

This may be an unpopular opinion, but it’s never okay to hoard more than you need while there others who genuinely need the things being hoarded. This is doubly true for housing.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›