this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
167 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35698 readers
4540 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You say "apple" to me and I'm #1, glossy skin, insides, all that

And how in the hell does one navigate life, or enjoy a book, if they're not a #1?! Reading a book is like watching a movie. I subconsciously assign actor's faces to characters and watch as the book rolls on.

Yet #5's are not handicapped in the slightest. They're so "normal" that mankind is just now figuring out we're far apart on this thing. Fucking weird.

EDIT: Showed this to my wife and she was somewhat mystified as to what I was asking. Pretty sure she's a 5. I get frustrated as hell when I ask her to describe a thing and she's clueless. "Did the radiator hose pop off, or is it torn and cracked?" "I don't know!"

EDIT2: The first Star Wars book after the movie came out was Splinter in the Mind's Eye. I feel like I got that title. What's it mean to you?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 minutes ago

I play DND with a "theatre of the mind" battle system (no map or miniatures, we just remember where we are) with a a dude who's a 5 and I have no idea how he does it.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Content not viewable in your region

WARNING your neurochip implant has detected copyrighted material in your imagination cortex. Please be aware that we are legally obliged to report repeat offenses to the authorities. For your protection, please refrain from picturing further copyrighted material.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 54 minutes ago

3 or 4

I can "picture" with images but it's not top accuracy. It's mostly imagining a thing existing

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

My brain is like a vector database, it stores the "feelings" of information, not the actual information - if that makes sense?

I can make lightning fast connections in my head when something happens, like when something breaks in production, I see the symptoms and the vectors just connect from effect to the cause.

Can I explain to others why and how I know where the problem is? Nope. ...Or yes, but it'll take a long time for me to follow the feeling-vectors and put them into words I can actually communicate to other people.

For actual people and characters in books I also retain the shape and ...something about them, but I couldn't explain how most people in my life look like to a sketch artist.

When I read a book, I kinda retain the "feeling" of the characters and maybe one or two visual traits. I can read thousands of pages of a character's adventures and I can maybe tell you their general body type and clothing - if they have an "uniform" they tend to wear.

I've read all 5 books (over 5000 pages) of The Stormlight Archive and I couldn't tell you what Kaladin (the main character) looks like. I have no visual recollection of his hair colour, eye colour, skin tone or body type.

It always baffled me when a movie adaptation of a book came out and people were really upset that the characters looked wrong. And I was just "... you remember what the people in books look like??". It turns out they do.

Oh, and DEFINITELY no voice in my head. I’d get myself committed if I had someone talking to me in my brain.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Most days I'm about a 3, sometimes it's more like 4. If I'm reading a book or doing something like that, where I'm really focusing on the visualization, I can get to 2. The only time I ever get to 1 is when I'm laying in bed at night about to fall asleep.

I have real trouble sleeping sometimes, and one of the things I do to help is put on instrumental music (lately, a lot of jazz sax), and then pick some random scenario, like:

"if I could be king of the world what policy changes would I make?"

Or "if I ever get to have kids, what kind of things would I most want to teach them?"

Or "Let's design the perfect floorplan for my dream home"

And as I begin to drift off, but while still consciously aware, I can see things in stunning detail, but it's always like they're semi transparent. That's not a great example, because there's no backdrop, but it's the best I've got.

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think I'm 1, but there's no way to know for sure. I find it easier to call out sounds rather than visuals. I can't "hear" a voice or a sound if I want to. Visuals seem to require more will for the same fidelity.

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

but there’s no way to know for sure

draw something from memory on a piece of paper, and then draw the same thing again while looking on a photo. --> can you tell the difference between the two drawings?

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

For those who are a 4 or 5 on this diagram: What are your dreams like?

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

They can be amazing or terrible. Fly, go through days in dreams, sex, get chased by a monster. Lucid dreams. I also have sleep paralysis, so it can get pretty fucked up. It's like having another life. Best part is I should be too old to have nocturnal emissions. Worst part is you can be so scared you wake yourself up (and your partner) by screaming. Or, in a few instances, choking or hitting your partner in your sleep.

I’m a 5. Dreams are fine. As realistic as I want them to be.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 hours ago

Pretty lifelike. Full color/sensory immersion, even to the point of feeling things like cold, heat, wind, hearing loud noises, smells etc. Sometimes, if ive been really sleep deprived, it can take me a solid few minutes to realize Im even awake and in the "real world".

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not as puzzled about the concept of aphantasia (or the opposite) as much as the fact that people here, and two I know IRL, always self report as either 1s or 5s, with a handful of exceptions (ATTOW).

Is there a selection bias, where anyone in-between doesn't relate to either extreme enough to comment, or do said extremes conflate the ability to "picture" fine details with the ability to remember them in the first place?

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

Well, if it makes anyone feel better, I'm somewhere around 2 or 3. But that's really nothing to write about.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'm noticing that in this comment section, too. I hadn't noticed before, but most people do seem to be one extreme or the other. I imagine it's because at either end they feel like they have something unique to offer the conversation, but those in the middle probably feel as if they are normal and it won't be interesting to contribute, maybe?

Ooc, what would you label yourself? I posted mine if you want to see my experience as someone who jumps around the spectrum a bit

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 53 minutes ago

Without rigorously researching the phenomenon, I'd put myself in the 2, edging towards 3 - I can visualize things with however many details I can see with my own eyes if I focus a little, but instinctually I only see vague shapes that serve their purpose in whatever scenario I'm thinking of.
I can rotate objects and remember the back-face details;
I can picture a moment from a story I was reading, where a bipedal nocturnal lizard in a cramped spaceship violently recoils from having a flashlight pointed at its eyes;
I cannot quantify the spacing between its eyes compared to the height between those and the tip of the nose as seen by a front-facing isometric projection, even if it's all a fiction and I could just make things up.

Basically my mind is running Unreal Engine 5 with medium settings, low LOD and AI generated textures - which would also explains a lot of other things now that I think about it.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 52 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

You guys are gonna lose your shit when you find out some people don't have an inner monologue.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

What the fuck do you mean some people don't have an inner monologue. How do they... Think thoughts? I literally cannot comprehend how they work through thoughts.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 minute ago

How the fuck would you function without an inner monologue AND aphantasia...

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm convinced lots of people actually don't think

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

Literally everyone does this tho. It only feels like everyone else because you can't be aware of when you're not thinking.

[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

My inner monologue even reacted to your comment when I read it 😅

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

That should be my next post! 😂 My inner monologue is like words on a page. And again, I can't see how one could enjoy a novel with the monologue and mind's eye.

[–] Potential_Pinata@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't 5 is called Aphantasia ? To be unable to visualize something in the mind?

[–] Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's more of a spectrum with hyper- and a- phantasia being the extremes on each end

(Prophantasia is considered the ability to project imagined images into your physical field of view)

If you really want to blow your mind (heh), you should check out SDAM (Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory), which is thought to be linked to aphantasia

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yep! Craziest thing is that we just started looking into this thing in the past 10-20 years. Proof to me that it's no handicap, but if you took my mind's eye away I'd feel crippled.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 5 points 2 hours ago

It has its benefits. You can talk absolute depravity, like Trump farting so much shit into Ivankas mouth that liquid diarrhea is overflowing from the side of her mouth with chunks of yesterday's pasta bolognese dangling off her chin, and get no mental image of that filth. But you can enjoy that imagery.

[–] OptimalHyena@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

I’m a 5, yet I can have extremely vivid dreams that are exactly like I am in that world. I can perfectly picture peoples faces from the past too while dreaming. So the ability is in there somewhere. 🤷‍♂️

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Do you ever experience hallucinations? Like see people or animals in the corner of your eye that turn out to be just shadows or a coat. I’m a 1 and I sometimes experience vivid hallucinations when I’m really tired or have just woken up. Like I have a recurring hallucination that I occasionally get. Sometimes when I wake up I see a spider hanging above my head. Then I jump out of bed and notice that nothing is there.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 26 points 6 hours ago (11 children)

I'm a #5 on that scale.

And how in the hell does one navigate life, or enjoy a book, if they’re not a #1?! Reading a book is like watching a movie. I subconsciously assign actor’s faces to characters and watch as the book rolls on.

I won't say I'm not jealous of people who're #1s. However, to directly answer your question, it's not like our heads are empty. You think apple and (apparently) 'see' an apple. I think apple and it's like thinking of how you'd describe an apple. It's red, it's round. It has a stem. It's juicy. It tastes good... but I can't see it. Or anything else. They're just thoughts.

I have a very difficult time with facial recognition, presumably as a result of this. If I'm watching a movie where there's a lot of characters that are shown but not named, I have a difficult time following that. I need to be able to assign names to them to keep them straight in my head, and often-times if a character isn't named but they're important, I'll assign them a name myself just to have something to track them with. I can recognize people I interact with a lot obviously but if you asked me to describe what someone looks like who I'm not currently interacting with, that's very difficult for me to do, beyond very surface-level stuff, like their gender or their build. If I had to describe someone for a police sketch, I'd be useless at that. Remembering facial features is like remembering a list of words; I can't just call up an image of them to describe... if I haven't already committed that description to memory, I can't describe the person.

It's funny, honestly, because I never realized this wasn't how everyone is until I saw the image you linked some years back. I actually called up my mother immediately after and asked her what she could see. The conversation went something like:

"When you think of an apple, can you see the apple?"

"Yes..."

"Yeah, but like... you can actually see it, though?"

"...yes...?"

"Yeah but I mean like... you can see it, as if you're looking at it?"

"...yes, what is this about?"

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago

You think apple and (apparently) 'see' an apple. I think apple and it's like thinking of how you'd describe an apple. It's red, it's round. It has a stem. It's juicy. It tastes good... but I can't see it. Or anything else. They're just thoughts

I think I’m a one, but I might be a five and I can’t tell, because how do I know what format my brain uses to tell me apple? I just know that it does.

I can imagine tastes well enough to cook pretty well and can often predict what a dish will taste like with pretty good accuracy ( I just recently saw a recipe for chocolate rosemary banana bread, and I could imagine that combination, even though I’d never had it before), so there are clearly some senses I can do it for. I think I can also do it visually, but I can’t exactly print it out, so I just know that I’ve received the thought.

[–] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (5 children)

I had that exact same conversation with my mom but it went like this:

"Ok mom, picture a cow in your head"

"Oookayyy"

"Now you can see a cow right?"

"What do you mean"

"Like... You can see a picture of the cow, right?"

"Nooo"

My dad chimes in "yes, obviously"

"...crap. Mom, I have some news for you"

Both of us grew up thinking we had no imagination or were dumb. I remember being incredibly frustrated when a teacher taught us the concept of the Memory Palace where you picture things in rooms of a house. Like if you had to remember five playing cards you'd picture a room with 7 red clowns, with hearts on their cheeks. Then in the next room you'd picture a king, holding up a spade, etc. That just made it harder for me to remember and the teacher kept telling me I wasn't listening or trying.

I feel that explanation about being useless to a sketch artist on a spiritual level, that blew my mind as a kid. To this day I can't really describe what my parents or wife looks like, I can just list characteristics. I feel my brain trying to visualize but then it comes up empty

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I've been told on Reddit that people with aphantasia can actually do the ‘memory palace’ thing. But, since it was just one commenter who didn't quite describe how it would work, while I myself can visualize but dislike the ‘palace’ technique, I have no further information as to how to do it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (8 children)

I'm definitely a 4. The shape is there, but even that's work for my brain. I know what a thing looks like, but I can't see it. Also, I think a lot less people are #1 than they think. A #1 is someone who can make photorealistic art from the picture in their brain. I'm guessing that's like 1% of the people if not less.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

I can "see" my wife's face, down to the pores, but I couldn't put it on paper. That's a whole 'nother skill. And yes, the combination of traits are probably more rare than 1%.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I am probably 1/2, but creating images in my mind is not something I do on a daily basis, which is probably why I lack creativity in certain areas. Also I had hard time remembering faces for most of my life, and only recently it get slightly better.

Also I've noticed that the more I think about how something looks like the less I am able to picture it in my head, sometimes even not being able to remember my crush's face which is probably strange as fuck.

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Attention is a big part for me to remember a thing. I never remember actor faces, even less so — names.

Names are hard for me in general. Unless I see it in chat or use the name for sufficient amount of time, there's no chance I'll remember it. That's one of my problems with movies: I never remember actors or directors, I remember characters and scenario.

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

For individual objects it is difficult to impossible for me to create the exact image.

For directions however, I can do a visual "fly" over the roads which I believe I should be going down, to make sure I'm going the right place. The roads are clear images, but not to the same effect of watching a video of someone driving along said roads.

I'm coming to think there is a lot more nuance to this than the 5 images let on.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

I'm coming to think there is a lot more nuance to this than the 5 images let on.

It's just that spatial skills are separate from the visualization ability, and are judged separately. I've been told even that people with aphantasia can do the ‘memory palace’ mnemonic technique, though I can't quite see how.

[–] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 1 points 55 minutes ago

Human brain only has five possible states :P

load more comments
view more: next ›