this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
103 points (98.1% liked)

News

33259 readers
2571 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Design flaws caused a Tesla Model 3 to suddenly accelerate out of control before it crashed into a utility pole and burst into flames, killing a woman and severely injuring her husband, a lawsuit filed in federal court alleges.

Another defect, with the door handle design, thwarted bystanders who were trying to rescue the driver, Jeff Dennis, and his wife, Wendy, from the car, according to the lawsuit filed Friday in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.

Wendy Dennis died in the Jan. 7, 2023, crash in Tacoma, Washington. Jeff Dennis suffered severe leg burns and other injuries, according to the lawsuit.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

This is a reminder that if you own a car, get a window breaker/seat belt cutter tool, and keep it in an easy-to-reach location in your car. They cost less than $10. After a crash, doors can get stuck or they may be locked, and seat belts may be hard to disengage. These tools are not only useful for your own car. If any bystander had that tool, they could have assisted regardless of the car model.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Tesla tests in production. People die. This is super simple.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

I will never assosiatr Tesla with actual company name. Tesla (OG) did invent bunch of things. Company should be named Edison at least.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Yea I love EVs but wtf, stop making the handles recessed. It doesn't add much to range and it only makes using the car harder. I have an EV9 and I hate the handles. Just let us push the handle to pop it out like old entertainment center glass doors.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

If it’s a choice between having the car look sleeker and not killing a few dozen people, I’m sure Musk is going to choose the former.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago) (2 children)

There’s also no reason that it’s a software handle. The interior “handles” on the model 3 I’m led to believe are a button with no connection to the handle and there’s an emergency release buried somewhere in the back seat. Saving $0.50 per car just like GM. “The lawsuits are cheaper.”

The rapid acceleration is fun but the average person who’s trying to take off their sweater or reach for their water bottle or whatever in the car is going to accidentally jam the pedal down and kill themselves. I suspect all these “unintended sudden acceleration” are just someone mashing the pedal and not having the reaction time to lift off. Almost every gas car will give you time and audible indication to react. Electric cars - people carriers, with screaming toddlers and pets, not sporty ones - simply reach 100mph in 7 seconds.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

There’s also no reason that it’s a software handle.

There is a reason. It would be easy to argue its not worth it though.

When you pull the door handle the glass window retracts below the rubber weather stripping, then the door latch unlocks and you open the door. When you close the door and it latches, the window moves back up into the weather stripping creating a tight seal.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Mustangs have been using a window-retract feature with mechanical handles since at least 2015 (S550 generation). I've had to open them with dead batteries and they opened fine without the retraction, though I'm sure it wears the rubber strip faster. I believe the Audi A5/A7 family has done the same for years. While frameless doors have been around for decades, the seal IS different on auto-drop doors to improve sealing. Regardless, as you said, "removing the mechanical handle" has a reason, and it's incredibly easy to argue against. Like many other Tesla design decisions, it's a cost-saving measure disguised as a functional necessity.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 44 minutes ago

People built this into the Smart Fortwo with a couple chips and wires. I can’t find a reference because it was about 15 years ago they did it, but it wasn’t complicated and the door latch remained entirely mechanical. I think that it was, in turn, a replication of another car’s feature which did this back in the 80s.

I think it’s 99% cost savings.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

That is not a good reason, that is software built to compensate for a stupid hardware design

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

That is not a good reason,

I didn't say it was a good reason. The OP said there was no reason. There is a reason.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You said there was no reason. There is a reason. You didn't ask for a good reason. It's also by absolutely no means unique to Tesla, despite how it is portrayed in articles like this.

Tesla isn't the first manufacturer to use frameless windows by any means. Audi, Toyota, Honda, Mercedes, Volkswagen, Mini, and Subaru just to name a few, have all used them in various "luxury" or higher end models over the years. It's perceived as luxury vehicle design, so it gets used quite a bit.

The handle not physically manipulating a latch also isn't unique. Corvette's have done this for years. Many recent vehicles from Lexus, Audi, Ferrari, Fiat, Lincoln, and Dodge again to name a few also use them, regardless of the flush exterior handle design. The handle design itself isn't the issue with these deaths, it's the electrical system failing. The flush handles causes issues with things like ice build-up, not being unable to open the door after a crash.

Articles like this always point to these issues, and act like they're unique to Tesla, but they're not. It's the same as it's always been, Tesla headlines get clicks, which drives interaction and sharing exactly like here, which all lead to increased advertising revenue.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

No I didn't, I am not the person the previous post replied to

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh yes I agree, the acceleration without a way to limit it is crazy. At least with the EV9 I can set it to eco and not have an accidental warp speed but it's still too much sometimes. Mine came with the boost feature enabled and no way to disable it. I refuse to allow my teenage son to learn to drive in it without a way to limit its torque. I am gonna go out and get him an old fashioned beater. EVs need a training mode that forces it to act more like a ICE car. Might get worse efficiency but it's safer.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 41 minutes ago

Perhaps an unpopular opinion but I think that the one-pedal kinda leads into this as well. You don’t remove your foot from the pedal to decelerate - in fact you keep pressure on it but less than while maintaining speed - and a twitch the wrong way makes it take off.

I am reminded that hand controls for driving are one-pedal, but they’re built backwards from the one-pedal in EVs. Push to stop, pull to start. That means that momentum pushes you into the brakes.