this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
6 points (52.7% liked)

Fediverse

38655 readers
388 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I read an old thread documenting the opinions of Lemmy maintainers an the .ml instance. The issue of funding a project with people openly expressing opinions many find distasteful and it being the biggest reddit alternative on the fediverse came up, so here's a topic to discuss it.

What should we do? What are the options?


Answer: No fork necessary, there are Piefed and Mbin.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 80 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We already have Piefed and Mbin.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

OK, thanks. I guess I'll be migrating to those and setting up a donation - if they don't use Github sponsors.

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also the piefed main dev is nice normal human being with humanist views of the world. He has a rational discourse toolkit box with links about how to handle extremism, disinformation and stuff like that.

Piefed would be much better aligned with your views.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlueKey@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago

Both main devs of Mbin support at least Librepay.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You have piefed if you really want to. I personally am fine with developers having views I disagree with, expecting everyone to have the same views as me is unrealistic; if they tried to influence how you host your instance based on their views that's something I'd disagree, but they do not do so on Lemmy.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We all have limits. For some communicating with those who tolerate genocide is alright, for others using their software is fine, and for even others they will happily give money to them à la "it's not me, so why should I care?". But if the number of people who don't care is not enough to sustain that software development, it will have an effect. We can wait to see if we get that far or do something about it.

I'll check out Piefed and Mbin as that seems to be most common answer here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Lemmy platform is just a tool to manage and delivery content. And I think it's important to differentiate the software from those who manages the software. I can see there's is a tacit connection and influence there. But unless they start baking inherently bias features into the software and skewing it, I don't think it's a big problem.

Also, because it's an inherently federated platform, if people don't like the opinions of those who run a specific instance, they can (with the inclination and determination) spin up their own instance and manage that the way they see fit. And that has happened quite a few times over the last couple of years.

So no, I don't think it requires a fork really. Not unless the people managing the main branch lose interest and the software starts to wither on the vine, or they start corrupting it somehow. But that's just my opinion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Once every couple months someone makes a post saying "I just found out the Lemmy devs are TANKIES! Won't someone do something about it?" No one has expressed real interest in forking Lemmy, though plenty of people have expressed interest in someone else forking Lemmy for them.

Most of the dev interest seems to be on Piefed right now. For some reason Mbin hasn't seemed to really take off, I don't see people talking about it as much.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mbin is just kinda weird. I guess there aren't too many people who are after a Reddit-like that also care too much about microblogging. Or maybe they do but the microblogging part of Mbin is just an inferior experience to Bluesky or Mastodon anyway? Or maybe people just dislike having to call shitposts in meme communities "articles" in "magazines"?

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

having to call shitposts in meme communities "articles" in "magazines"?

That is super clunky and I do hate it.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just wish .ml was more honest with their rules and policies, so people can actually make an informed decision, before they sign up there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There is Piefed, it's compatible with Lemmy instances and has a whole load of useful feature for both users and moderators.

Much quicker and responsive development (I've been able to get two small feature/improvement requests implemented within weeks of my initial issue post).

One of the Lemmy developers is also an admin on the notorious Lemmygrad instance.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks like I'll be checking that out.

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It's great, a lot better than Lemmy.

The main weakness IMO is that Voyager doesn't support most of the cool features of Piefed (core interaction works great though). I have yet to try Interstellar. The mobile WebUI is pretty good, albeit in need of some polish and optimisations.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

I'll check it out. Thanks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maiq@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago

Maybe join piefed and if you want block ml.

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I really don't like this dangerous trend of condemning actions of people based on wether we agree with them or disagree with them.

Because this behavior is at the base for intolerance and strong polarization.

First of all, I want to judge your actions for what they are, not for what your political views are. So Lemmy is good and I like that full stop. There will be better alternatives (maybe already are) and I will judge them without agreeing with their creators political views.

Second, I prefer to discuss and interact with people who have different views and political ideas than me, because that's where I grow my ideas and enforce or dispute them. Enough of the echo chamber where the "algorithm" already places us in every social fucking media.

Kids, it's by enforcing and supporting even the ideas contrary to yours that you grow up. Yes this is annoying and can cause serious brain engagement, but yeah, that's how we progress.

Even fascists or communist ideas. Zionist or pro-Palestine, pro gender or anti woke, if we start judging peoples actions only for their ideas we become fascists.

I was also tought that what you do is more significant than what you say. Judge by actions, not words.

So I don't dislike technology because the guy behind it is a fascist or a communist.

Said so, if anybody thinks that can do a better Lemmy by forking it, go ahead and let me judged by the actions.

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is the “radical centrist” position, and it’s serves the fascist power structure.

None of the things you’re comparing to each other are equal or opposite. You’re functionally saying “I consider good and evil to be equal, I tolerate intolerance”.

I’m not sure if you stand behind your examples, because you didn’t really say anything.

For starters…if you wanted to address the topic you would have compared apples to apples ie fascists to tankies. You can’t casually imply fascists and communists are two ends of a spectrum and both have interesting points to make, that’s absurd: the former are evil, and the latter are dreamers. The rest of your examples are similar.

The topic here is “what level of tankie propaganda are we dealing with, and is it appropriate to allow them to control what we read”.

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe the fact I am not a native speaker affect how my words are understood.

Actually yes fascist and communist are two ends of the spectrum, I have no idea what tankies means, it seems to be some slang or jargon.

But no, why would using lemmy means people from Lemmy.ml controlling what we read? That's totally bonkers.

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No, fascism and communism aren’t “opposites”…that’s the fascist framing…and that’s my point. It’s extreme centrism and “both sidesing” to claim they are. They’re only opposites if you preface your argument with good v evil…and you didn’t. Fascism is a dangerous system that’s arguably ever-present and destroys humanity….while communism is a highly ideological philosophy that’s never existed. Don’t be confused when highly socialist and authoritarian countries are labelled as communist…they’re no more communist than the DRC was a democracy or a republic.

Tankie is the word you’re looking for: authoritarian communism…and it’s important you use the proper word, because authoritarianism is antithetical to communism. If you didn’t know what the word meant…why did you even comment?

The topic was a conversation about whether or not certain Tankies have an outsized influence on Lemmy, and if that’s bad. The consensus seems to be that they can’t.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OK, let's say somebody who hates you to the core and wants to see you dead made software you found great. All they said was stuff like "I think your kind deserves to be shot", "your kind are subhuman", "they hung your kind and I see nothing wrong with that".

Would you use their software? Would you enjoy being part of the numbers that they use to validate getting money, maybe even power? Would you publicly promote their software? Would you get others to use it? Would you even donate to them? Would you get others to donate to them?

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 9 points 1 week ago

How does the Lemmy creators actually personally benefit from the fact I run my own Lemmy instance?

I do not donate to them, but how is the technology created be them evil if it fits my concept of decentralized web?

Do they get money because I run my instance o use another one not under their control? O doubt it

I am actually using their tech against themselves, so what?

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

This is some of the most pretentious, ostentatious posturing I've read on this topic.

You really think people can't see through this?

You don't see the irony in doing the "sophomoric debate club" thing while calling those that disagree with you "Kids".

"Dangerous trends", "base of intolerance" or the pompous drivel about "grow my ideas and enforce and dispute them" are almost comical in their tone.

The world doesn't work that way. This is a motherfucking internet forum.

Or is this a satire of American style polemics and I got played? 🤣

If it's satire, then good job!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jonnylyy@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I totally support what you said. If I don't support someone financially by using his or her product I don't see a big issue. And when reading through Lemmy comments for any given open source project there is at least one comment saying the mantainer said or did something or even a contributer is an asshole or has the wrong political view and therefore nobody should use the Programm. As long as the maintainer try's to make something that more or less follows my views for a open and decentralized web I'm fine. If I think about donating on the other hand I would check if the morals are on the same line

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reactionary forks don't have a great record of success (or even getting off the ground).

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Piefed already exists (although I contest the use of "reactionary" here)

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago

It's also not a fork

[–] hono4kami@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

PieFed is not even a fork, btw, it's a completely different software

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rglullis@communick.news 18 points 1 week ago

I think that Richard Stallman is a despicable person. Never stopped me from using and supporting the development of Emacs and GNU tools for the past 25+ years.

[–] gerowen@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is the code good? Are you prepared to make any potential fork viable and useful in ways that Lemmy isn't so people have a tangible, non-ideological reason to choose your software over Lemmy? Do you have a long term goal for funding and maintaining a fork?

That said, Piefed is already a thing, and it federates with Lemmy. It's where I'm commenting from right now. It has a better on boarding process and does a better job surfacing things I care about.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

I write opensource software, I donate to opensource, I use opensource. I however can't do everything. That is why the question is "we" not "hey @gerowen@piefed.social why don't you make a fork, you lazy bastard". Code is not the only way to contribute to a project and I'm willing to donate to lemmy alternatives while it is still possible for me.

Piefed might be where I start donating. Gotta check it out first.

[–] RalfWausE@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't see a "we" in this, follow the free software way: Don't like it? Fork it yourself or don't use it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you want to, go ahead.

But Lemmy isn't a small project. Can you really bear the maintenance burden alone?

And Piefed & Mbin already exist, just recommend them over Lemmy then? They are also supposed to be easier to maintain, so fork them if you want to fork something.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

This has been rethreaded so many times I feel like it deserves an entry in knowyourmeme. Opinions are like asses, everyone has one, everyone things someone else's stink, in the end, what matters is you can support Lemmy without actually supporting the developers (eg.: support your local instance).

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can use mbin if you want out of the Lemmy codebase, it's a separate codebase that does the same thing.

[–] BlueKey@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

Not only the same thing, some features are even better compared to Lemmy.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What should we do?

There is no "we" and you can start a fork/rewrite if you want to, good luck!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are insane. But their views don't seem to ever make it into the code, so I don't mind for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] m33@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Usually it is as this point things turn to shit in opensource/community/fediverse/cooperative. The devs are not the product.

Who will go in holidays with 100% of the team for every product one use ?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't see the point in boycotting something that's free and doesn't make money off of selling my data. I suppose you aren't obligated to donate to it, but that was already true.

I suppose OTOH, I'm not pro-tankie, but I at least prefer tankies to the fascists and authoritarian capitalists (or whatever you want to call them) that run mainstream media. Harm reduction is the name of the game IMO, not finding a platform with a perfect set of political values aligning with yours (at least for me, I haven't run into many leftists who are also committed to nonviolence due to pragmatic reasons). The russia/ukraine stuff in that thread you link does look nasty, on the other other hand

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Just don't give money to the instance they own that is pro russian occupation and pro china human right abuses

[–] vermaterc@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The main advantage of fediverse over, let's say X, is that you can change server if you find owner not trustworthy. So just do it, it's exactly why it was designed in this way, to let you do it easily.

But talking about funding... I might indeed reconsider doing this...

[–] aesviation@lemmings.world 5 points 1 week ago

No, I think they're doing a great job.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

Lemmy works over ActivityPub, which is the thing that provides the federation, and what people has been accostumed to call Lemmy as a whole. But there is more software that works with AP. No need to create a copy, other software can do similar things (for example: mbin, piefed, mastodon, etc).

load more comments
view more: next ›