this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
154 points (98.1% liked)

World News

35171 readers
474 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

Israel is anti~~se~~medic

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When they are 'normally' murdered by bombing them or whatever they usually use 'found dead' or some euphemism.
In this case they use the world 'killed'. Something must be really wrong then.
Somewhere below the genocider apologetics, "without headlights or emergency signals" "alleging Hamas militants had been in the Red Crescent ambulance" it's clear they had been EXECUTED, not killed.
Never honest reporting from the UK regime press, always doing dammage control.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You make it sound like the details arent already out. They were executed and dismembered.

They were found over the weekend in a mass grave with around 20 multiple gunshots in each one of them, according to Mahmoud Basal, spokesperson for the Palestinian Civil Defence in Gaza.

At least one of them had their legs bound, another was decapitated and a third topless, he added.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/bodies-gaza-medics-found-handcuffed-and-shot-mass-grave

The AP article about it is similar and there seems to be plenty photo and video evidence of the bodies.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You make it sound like the details arent already out. They were executed and dismembered.

No I didn't, I'm pointing out they didn't write EXECUTED.
What are you trying to do here?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Something must be really wrong then.

...

You make it sound like the details arent already out.

This is really not a complicated line of thought.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

who TF are you talking to?

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you have anything to back this up? I've never felt The Guardian was using euphemisms

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are supposed to act as the progressive paper in the UK but when it comes down to it they tow the line.
Somewhat less obvious but still.
Already clear from long ago.
A good example is Jullian Assange and how they fully went along with smearing him and printing lies.

Do you have anything to back this up?

There is no obligation to do what anyone can look up themselves.
Anyway, this took me 3 seconds to find:

half a dozen current and former staff at the BBC, Sky, ITN, the Guardian and the Times have disclosed the extent of anti-Palestinian prejudice in their newsrooms.

https://www.declassifieduk.org/battle-for-the-truth-pro-israel-bias-inside-uk-newsrooms-revealed/

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have any examples of the Guardian dancing around the word 'killed'? The fact you have to resort to their reporting on unrelated issues seems to suggest that's not really the case

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I gave you a link showing their anti-Palestinian prejudice .
You fixating on this one word while that detail is not my point and a deliberate misinterpretation of my statement: "Never honest reporting from the UK regime press".
Also calling that link unrelated, being negaive and dismissive sure smells like the usual sneaky hasbara tricks.
Nice try tho, now go away.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You gave a link accusing them of quoting Israeli officials

You don't seem to be able to back up your accusation that they have been avoiding to use the word 'killed'. So why make it?

The Guardian is not misinforming their readers about what's happening in Gaza.

The way you're talking about this is telling me that you're too far gone to look at these things objectively

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And can you describe what you think is wrong with that article? Does it make you question whether those 60+ dead were unrelated to the Israeli attack??

If that's the case then it's just an issue of the Guardian being written for smarter people

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

fuck off nazi
Now changing the subject again?
All your comments everywhere are defending genocider scum
Get back to hasbara training

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You sound like a caricature account ran by the Mossad to discredit pro-Palestinian posters

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

LOL that's you, your obvious weak smear and your comment history are here for everyone to see.
The hasbara tools really suck these days.
What happened, too much of that scum sent to murder babies and getting killed that they now have to use the not so bright specimens?

[–] narr1@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Right to defend itself, huh?

[–] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

they were at fault for putting the back of their heads against the barrels of our guns while we were harmlessly shooting! shame on you antissemitics!