CapriciousDay

joined 1 month ago
[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

To understand this you need to understand the theory. Marx outlined that socialism and communism each had to be transitioned to after reaching a given level of social/economic development. In particular there is the notion of "withering away of the state" which would happen after a global revolution, which is the aim of this classless/moniless society they outlined.

The communist manifesto is a short read!

In fact the USSR implemented explicit market policies, a sort of contained capitalism, which was designed to facilitate reaching the necessary preconditions for socialism and communism. Essentially all of the "communist" states we've seen so far have been some play on the notion of just "socialism in one country" in the Marxist-Leninist version of communist parties, who have/had the goal of eventually reaching communism.

What's probably most interesting is that the idea behind the USSR wasn't initially to have the state direct everything from the top, but in fact to facilitate worker councils (soviets) to direct their workplaces.

But you have to remember this all happened in the context of a state which had recently undergone a revolution, was rife with counterrevolutonary action (see revolutionary France and civil war Britain to see how this played out during the birth of liberalism) and was then plunged into WW2 where most states involved were acting fairly dictatorially for the duration of it. Followed shortly by the US making it an explicit goal to prevent world communism through e.g. CIA intervention because they feared "domino theory"

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 23 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Fascism on the rise? Better get their list making and person finding mechanisms sorted out for them in advance.

-liberals everywhere

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's more like, a blog is a personal thing. Using some off the shelf solutions removes that sense of personality to me I guess. It kind of makes the act of publishing the post feel like I've cheated somehow, when, all I'm really doing is putting text on the internet and I'm perfectly capable of doing that myself from a technical POV.

I get this with game dev as well, I'm much happier with games where I feel like I've worked with lower level tooling than a pre made engine. Sort of a personal not made here syndrome thing I suppose.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've had a few hosted ones but I kind of hate them. I think I'll build and self host a solution at some point because I just like things that I've made myself better.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

I bought a collection of Dreamcast bits, Sonic Adventure and Powerstone (yes I know they're easy to pirate, but the ✨vibes✨) a while back on a whim without owning the console and now I've got a whole setup with a CRT. Living the retro dream(cast).

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

All well and good until you turn up to see Farage posing with a pint.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago

As it happens you don't actually have to be a social chauvinist for the country in which you reside.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They were pretty well optimised, frequently sharpened and they had an angled blade with a decent amount of weight behind it. This means that there's reduced surface area at the point of contact so higher penetration. Guillotines don't miss as they've got a guide, unlike axes which were known for occasionally gouging the victim's back, because executioners did miss!

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't really understand how this pans out like that. The US seems to be tanking its own economy at an alarming rate, Russia is still basically a heavily militarised Italy in terms of its economy. Europe is going to suffer but it seems like the only leverage Russia really has is military and gas reserves (which Europe has since hedged against after the energy price spike) at this point.

If you ask me the whole alliance between Russia and the US is notable mostly because it creates a one-sided nuclear hegemony where they each have significant missile defences and other countries don't have enough arms to overwhelm those, essentially undermining the MAD idea. But you know that's not economic, that's "might is right."

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

It might not be nutritionally optimal or particularly appetising but like 9 cans of tinned meal of your choice will get you through that kind of period and won't take a lot of space.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Potentially with experienced staff members they might try to call its bluff but then it seems like they've also been uprooting experienced personnel, making everyone unstable, replacing them with Trumper patsies etc. which probably minimises this kind of pushback.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

"hey guys I was just chatting with the wives and they all think waging war is for guys with small dick energy"

 

Or maybe a catchier name would be a "basic human decency GPL extension"

I can't help but notice that organisations constantly co-opt free software which was developed with the intent to promote freedom, use it to spread hate and ideas which will ultimately infringe on freedom for many.

The fact that hateful people who use such software may then go on to use it to promote or otherwise support fascism which prevents others from enjoying the software in the way it was imagined, is one potential manifestation of the paradox of tolerance in this respect. I think this is particularly true for e.g. social media platforms and the fediverse.

My proposal to combat this would be the introduction of a "paradox of tolerance" license which says that organisations which use the software must enforce a bare-minimum set of rules to combat intolerance. So anti-racism, anti-homophobia, anti-transphobia, etc. The idea is then to make overtly hateful organisations legally liable for the use of the software through the incompatibility of the requirements with their hateful belief system.

This could be an extension to GPL and AGPL where the license must be replicated in modified versions of the software, thereby creating virality with these rules.

Is this a thing already? I understand OS and FOSS have historically had a thing for political neutrality but are we not starting to find the faults with this now?

view more: next ›