Cletus

Can't believe westerners have just glossed over the repeated drone strikes on the dormitory in Luhansk that killed 21 people. Western media did their best by calling it "temporarily Russian occupied territory". Lol

Last time I checked targeting the civilians of the territory that's supposedly " temporarily occupied" doesn't sound like its either temporary, or "occupied". Ain't no way Ukraine is getting Luhansk back. Oh and AFTER the attack the teachers from the college were put on Myrotvorets which is essentially a kill list where people are doxxed.

But people will still call Russia the terrorists. Peak projection. As you said they are getting desperate.

Edit Reading the Wikipedia is disgusting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Starobilsk_strike

In the first paragraph: "a drone hit a student dormitory" but within the same article they acknowledged that it was infact 16 drones.

Unlike Jan 6th people I would be extremely surprised if these people get pardoned if democrats get back in power.

Ukraine becoming increasingly Israeli, wait no American day by day.

Unsurprising no western media has covered this. Reddit calling this a false flag by Russia. 😂

Looks like Ukraine is getting desperate to expand the war. They know they can't win at the going rate, probably getting low on people to bussify. Not that expanding the front to Belarus makes much sense either.

America thinking that taking oligarchs assets will hurt Russia is so funny. Not only will the Russian oligarchs have less power, they'll never trust the west again, and it accelerated their technological independence.

And now any country will seize the opportunity to shy away from the USD. Which has been one of their most important tools for imperialism.

How they never saw this coming is bewildering.

Got to have been a psyop in one way or another. It was pushed heavily by the "effective altruism" people, which has got to be a psyop in and of itself. And their plebeians ate it up.

No better way to get people to create ai than tricking them into thinking theyll be eternally tortured if they don't.

During covid some father had to send photos of his baby to a doctor and google detected it as csam. They nuked all his accounts (including his phone number) reported it to police, who opened a case against him.

What's really alarming is that all these tech firms hire people to look through this stuff manually, and pedos have been known to take this job. Essentially they pay pedos to look at csam all day. And the only way for ai to be accurate at all is for the ai to have been trained on csam. So if any AI company says they can detect csam their admitting that they've downloaded tons of it.

We were talking past each other I believe you about 4chan ect.

Doesn't help that the question is vague

Smh

"its clearly personal because you remember so much about me while i do not know you at all"

"brought up random shit that happened months ago, put words in my mouth, took my comments out of context"

This is contradicting. I didn't "remember" anything I went and found our dms that you initiated so I could accurately recount the context and what was said verbatim. The complete opposite of putting words of putting words in your mouth.

Not only that but you've been the only one to make personal judgements here. And outright lied about our interaction on reddit.

"its not an ”ig model” its a daniela from katseye… i explained this to u the first time u accused me of having a ”thirst trap” as a profile photo. why are you so worked up over my fucking daniela profile pic? why is a woman existing considered a thirst trap to you? "

You never explained who your PFP was that's a fabrication.

Made it personal by saying I have a "problem with women just existing" which falls apart upon examining the context. Yet I'm somehow the the one leaving context out. I have no issue with that woman or the photo.

"bringing up random shit from month ago". Aren't you doing the same by mentioning that i called it a "thirst trap" devoid of any context.

In all of my replies I've at least put in some effort instead of just saying what sounds best.

Infact i quoted myself in full calling you a "freak" which i easily could've ommitted. I've been good faith in representing what happened accurately even when it made me look bad.

Fine I'm wrong, sexist and reactionary, but at least I'm honest.

-less liberals/irrelavant topics, plus many are here because they were banned from reddit for being to based.

-in other thread of yours

But to add

Nothing wrong with it in and of itself, I just thought it was strange in conjunction when a freshly created reddit account with 8k karma 400 contributions, was saying liberal stuff, about russia, while having a soviet hat in there pfp. Already having a personal brand so to speak. Its generally only informative, long time users that have decent pfp especially on reddit. It seemed inorganic / exactly what feds would do if they were running an account.

Was due to the totality of the circumstances

Am I reading it right that the reason given was I was fedposting?

Thanks tho

Edit also how can one contact the mods, where are the rules?

Idk I'm just trying to be thorough and transparent. As I'm toeing a fine line.

I typed a response to theyre implicit accusation of me being an incel but my phone restarted before i posted it. Maybe I'll re type it. But for brevities sake I referred to it in that way presuming that they're fed. As in if the feds were to make a profile why wouldn't they use a "thirst trap" as the PFP, and slap on a Soviet hat on to call it a day. Honeypot esque. I don't think there's anything wrong with referring to it that way. If I had a brad pit PFP and someone referred to it that way that would be fair. They're profile just stuck out to me as "hello fellow kids" like.

Plus its frustrating that were getting hung up on one word I used, missing the forest for the trees. Only serves to derail the conversation.

However ill push back on me being "hyperdefensive". Im trying to be as transparent as possible because I feel it would be worse to make this admittedly inflammatory post/comment but just leave it that. I'm just trying to air out my motivations so it doesn't have presumed. I understand it makes me look worse and hyperdefensive but Id prefer that than the contrary.

And no I wasnt "misinterpreting their post as “everyone that uses the term goy is a reactionary”

In my other comment: "The phrasing of your low effort post is… poor. I think it would be better to have asked if using the term is reactionary in the first place. Instead of conflating it with reactionaries from the beginning."

Idk... I really just want to see more principled discussions and was annoyed with the replies more so than the post itself. I prefer to lurk, reading more informed opinions than my own. I'll go back to lurking after this lol.

I was disappointed to see confident yet lazy statements, and presumptuous personal attacks that im a sexist or reactionary and that's its self evident thereby uskng thst to discredit anything else I said

Its not "drama" from the past I was trying to establish a track record of them holding ignorant opinions and behaving fed like. The first interaction I had I said:

"Bot detected. 25 day old account 8 karma, 400 contributions, pfp is some thirst trap with a poorly edited ussr (hat) on top. Or just dome freak (as opposed to a bot) regardless whyre you posting so much if you don't know what you're talking about." In response to them saying

"They also use North Korean soldiers. I feel very sad for those poor souls despite them being technically on the enemy side, they are mostly clueless"

On shitliberalssay

Shouldn't have called them a freak, idrk what I meant tho it was awhile ago. I guess It just gave weird parasocial gooner adolescent vibes cuz it was reddit after all. And with that PFP I called them a freak, as I think many people would, quite the contrary to me being an incel. It felt like they were incel like themselves. But I apologize for saying that based off assumptions I made.