FauxLiving

joined 1 month ago
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"I have a problem with people spraying perfume around me sometimes, don't you have a problem with people spraying things into the atmosphere that really have no type of empirical data, that you just don't know who they are or what they're doing?" said Sen. Ileana Garcia, R-Coral Gables, the bill's sponsor, on Thursday morning.

Suddenly no longer a climate change denier.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

What's the follow on effect from making generated images illegal?

Do you want your freedom to be at stake where the question before the Jury is "How old is this image of a person (that doesn't exist?)". "Is this fake person TOO child-like?"

When that happens, how do you tell which images are AI generated and which are real? How do you know who is peddling real CP and who isn't if AI-generated CP is legal?

You won't be able to tell, we can assume that this is a given.

So the real question is:

Who are you trying to arrest and put in jail and how are you going to write that difference into law so that innocent people are not harmed by the justice system?

To me, the evil people are the ones harming actual children. Trying to blur the line between them and people who generate images is a morally confused position.

There's a clear distinction between the two groups and that distinction is that one group is harming people.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's the power of defaults.

1 person will hate the change but 100 others will be affected by the default and not care. The net result is more as revenue even if the first user cancels their account.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Exactly this.

You're not the customer. Google is an advertising company, their customers are people who buy ads.

People who watch shorts watch more videos so there are more slots to put ads in. So, you're going to watch shorts.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (15 children)

Child Sexual Abuse Material is abhorrent because children were literally abused to create it.

AI generated content, though disgusting, is not even remotely on the same level.

The moral panic around AI that leads to implying that these things are the same thing is absurd.

Go after the people filming themselves literally gang raping toddlers, not the people typing forbidden words into an image generator.

Don't dilute the horror of the production CSAM by equating it to fake pictures.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Congress is just letting the Executive Branch complete usurp it's power because they value party above country.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Blessed by Stephen Hawking himself

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Give it a few days

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

It's not unfair to say, given recent events, that Israel has an unusual amount of influence over Western countries.

Nothing antisemitic about it. Israel has the means and capabilities of running influence operations in a way that Palestine doesn't.

"Jewish bankers", however, is a pretty common antisemitic trope so I don't think you're wrong about this specific commenter

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If I find out Lemmy.world has a mouse favicon I'm going to be disappointed

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It is literally uBlock. It updates with uBlock, uses uBlock filtering, uBlock options, uBlock UI.

The only difference is that it also does ad fuckery and there is a button that you can press to configure the ad fuckery and see a log of the ad fuckery.

Other than that it is exactly uBlock.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just have everyone agree on a set of fonts to report and report those.

view more: next ›