TabularTuxedo

joined 1 month ago
[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tuesday is the worst day.

But yeah, agreed. Tired too.

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Odyssey is like Cars 2: a sequel that follows a character from the previous movie and is completely divorced from the plot of the previous movie.

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Iliad can accurately be called Troy Story.

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Leftists yearn to be guerrilla fighters with bases in mountainous terrain that you can only reach by climbing.

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 days ago

Also another interesting thing. There are three states with a uncodified constitution: United Kingdom, New Zealand, and the Zionist regime.

Of these three, "Israel" is the only one without clearly defined territories in any law. I wonder why that is /s

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

caffeine restricts some blood flow to your brain.

What. I didn't know this.

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I was reading law this week (for an exam) and I noticed some things about constitutions: (not a lawyer, so this isn't legal advice)

  1. Constitution states, but does not explain. Look at these articles from the Constitution of the USSR:

    ARTICLE 1. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is a socialist state of workers and peasants.

    ARTICLE 121. Citizens of the U.S.S.R. have the right to education.

    Like, the Constitution doesn't bother to explain why exactly the people of the USSR chose socialism as their system of government nor the entire theory of Marxism-Leninism. It also doesn't explain what subjects are gonna be taught in schools etc. The Constitution is a guideline for future developments. Explanations are probably part of jurisprudence.

    I know it's a bit obvious that this is the purpose of constitutions but I still think it's neat to note. Imagine if Marx wrote like this:

    Article 20. Labor-power is the capacity to do work.

    Article 21. The proletariat is the class defined by its lack of capital and whose only means to sustain itself is by selling labor-power to the bourgeois.

    Then in a book, he goes like:

    Consequently, it appears that the capitalist buys their labour with money, and that for money they sell him their labour. But this is merely an illusion. What they actually sell to the capitalist for money is their labour-power (Constitution, Article 21). [...]

    All Marxist theory would just people citing articles from the "Constitution" in other documents and exploring its consequences.

  2. Law works in a general pattern: "If X, then Y, unless Z happens, in which case W."

    For example, everyone has the right to move anywhere, except if you commit a crime, in which case you lose your freedom in jail. Laws don't work like physical laws or Math axioms that generalize a lot of cases. It's a general principle and then a ton of exceptions.

    Exception in laws is where loopholes live and arguably where the bourgeoisie do their businesses.

  3. Law is made to achieve an outcome.

    Also obvious but noting this kind of takes away the "power" of the law. Like, if you know that a law was made to punish protests then you know you should protest even if it's illegal. Because...

  4. Law is a superstructure.

    Law only exists if there is people to enforce it and people to obey it. Otherwise it's just a piece of paper. Even something that isn't a law like a sign that says "Do NOT touch the saw. The saw CAN turn on at ANY moment" is probably gonna have way less disobedience than a federal law that forbids loitering.

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's cool! Does your language describe other things in the same style?

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You are a native Romanian speaker? That's cool as hell.

Also, yeah. learning languages is one of the most rewarding things someone can do. Especially ones that are completely different.

I learned Sign language in the past. To say something like "when do we go to the store?" you really need to think about the space, facial expressions, the Deaf culture etc.

[–] TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Interesting. I didn't know Romanian worked like this.

21
Talking to my mother (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by TabularTuxedo@lemmygrad.ml to c/comradeship@lemmygrad.ml
 

CW: religious trauma etc.

I still think about whether I should tell the truth to my mother. Like "I don't believe our religion is the truth." (religion is a cult)

She does seem like she knows I don't believe anymore. She asks that sometimes but I always deflect. It's obvious tbh. She doesn't seem the type of mother to kick me out of the house due to change of beliefs but she would tell other people. I love her a lot but she could do that.

It would be a clean break if she did. People in this cult would stop talking to me. Some have already cut me off due to how "weak" and "unresponsive to God" I look. Even some that I've known for years. Never had a true friend, I suppose.

I'm not really asking for advice on whether I should tell the truth to her or not. You don't know my mother nor me so whatever happens is my decision. I could always just bid my time and fade slowly. However long that is and however many lies I have to tell. Lying hurts.

Really, it's just venting about how funny it is that other revolutionaries did so many things under the threat of death and I'm here afraid of talking to my mother.

I remember when I finally woke up a year ago and I wrote in my diary "Today God died in my heart". Well, I think his corpse is still there. A false idol that was there since my birth.

Well anyways, thanks for reading. I'm still gonna have my life. I hope so.

(Also, I am aware that not all religions are like this. I'm an atheist not a reddit atheist)

 

For example, I know that the Siege of Stalingrad was extremely important, but I don’t get why the Soviets taking the city was enough for the Nazis to lose the entire Caucasus region.

(edit: Thanks for the answers!)

 

I changed the css of marxists.org using Stylus. I think it ended up pretty good.

Do you do something similar? Even if it's just changing the font on the ebook reader?

view more: next ›