maplebar

joined 7 months ago
[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I somewhat agree with you, and I think we're also saving Trump and the Republicans from themselves here.

On the other hand, it is undoubtedly a great thing that SOMEONE has finally put their foot down and challenged Trump's authority to run the economy by fiat.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

As a Portlander, I'm really happy that some of the people that we elected here in Portland and Oregon lead this legal fight to stop Trump's dumb fucking bullshit trade way by fiat.

In some ways we are saving the economy from Trump, and thus saving Trump from facing the ramifications of his own stupid fucking decisions, but on the other hand, it's nice that something is being done to challenge his authority.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Is the ai doing anything that isn’t already allowed for humans. The thing is, generative ai doesn’t copy someone’s art. It’s more akin to learning from someone’s art and creating you own art with that influence. Given that we want to continue allowing hunans access to art for learning, what’s the logical difference to an ai doing the same?

AI stans always say stuff like this, but it doesn't make sense to me at all.

AI does not learn the same way that a human does: it has no senses of its own with which to observe the world or art, it has no lived experiences, it has no agency, preferences or subjectivity, and it has no real intelligence with which to interpret or understand the work that it is copying from. AI is simply a matrix of weights that has arbitrary data superimposed on it by people and companies.

Are you an artist or a creative person?

If you are then you must know that the things you create are certainly indirectly influenced by SOME of the things that you have experienced (be it walking around on a sunny day, your favorite scene from your favorite movie, the lyrics of a song, etc.), AS WELL AS your own unique and creative persona, your own ideas, your own philosophy, and your own personal development.

Look at how an artist creates a painting and compare it to how generative AI creates a painting. Similarly, look at how artists train and learn their craft and compare it to how generative AI models are trained. It's an apples-to-oranges comparison. Outside of the marketing labels of "artificial intelligence" and "machine learning", it's nothing like real intelligence or learning at all.

(And that's still ignoring the obvious corporate element and the four pillars of fair use consideration (US law, not UK, mind you). For example, the potential market effects of generating an automated system which uses people's artwork to directly compete against them.)

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Either get rid of copyright for everything and everyone, or don't.

But no stupid BULLSHIT exception for AI slop.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone know what reciprocal means?

Just checking.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a surprise that all these techbros who want to steal everything and feed it into their AI machines without paying a single fucking cent to the original creators all the sudden want to get rid of IP. They can lead by example by submitting their IP into the public domain.

Or maybe they're just massive frauds?

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

AI isn't ready to replace just about anybody's job, and probably never will be technically, economically or legally viable.

That said, the c-suit class are certainly going to try. Not only do they dream of optimizing all human workers out of every workforce, they also desperately need to recoup as much of the sunk cost that they've collectively dumped into the technology.

Take OpenAI for example, they lost something like $5,000,000,000 last year and are probably going to lose even more this year. Their entire business plan relies on at least selling people on the idea that AI will be able to replace human workers. The minute people realize that OpenAI isn't going to conquer the world, and instead end up as just one of many players in the slop space, the entire bottom will fall out of the company and the AI bubble will burst.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Big tech will do what is best for extracting money customers and investors.

If you really care what your operating system is made of, use Linux.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Why the fuck is our media so bad that they blindly accept Trump's bullshit line that the tariffs are "reciprocal"? Are they just stupid or have they been paid off? Do they not know the meaning of "reciprocal" or are they just too fucking lazy to question the White House's rhetoric even a little bit?

The state of the United States makes me sick. We're being robbed blind by the oligarchy in broad daylight while the media gleefully amplifies the administrations lies.

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago (3 children)

These fucking guys only ever lie and deny.

Are we really too stupid and weak as a country to be able to do anything about this?

[–] maplebar@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

I wouldn't do it. But then again I'm not a fascist imperialist dictator with delusions of grandeur.

view more: next ›