tocano

it's not social because everything is bots and ai slop /s

not an organ and having a stronger immune system would kill you

Some of the translations seem like order / suggestion for the formal singular "you".

I guess no one deserves Fundamental Rights, anymore.

It is the company's responsability for people dumping the plastic. If they made as much publicity for responsible disposal as they do for comsumption of their products, people would be better. They can also produce less or in better recipients.

The company makes the plastic bottles, which don't need to be plastic, and then uses marketing to promote consumption. The people are not to blame for being exploited by the scheme of the corporations. If this company stopped existing tomorrow, I'm sure people would consume less just from the lack of advertisement.

For tis topic I love the discussion of Rational Animations. Here is one of the videos of the topic:

Humanity was born way ahead of its time. The reason is grabby aliens.

We are living the plot from PsychoPass

Maybe they would like nostr more

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostr

I'd argue agents often participate willingly because they are conditioned to view the people as enemies threatening their lives. The phrase "just following orders" is used afterwards to ease guilt and shift responsibility.

Every corner of the world is in a way suffering from war, corruption, or civil unrest, not just "The West"

Firstly, do you mean only animals aren't possessions? What about all other things and resources?

Secondly, are you saying people should do they best to keep consumption to a minimum, while surviving themselves? Does this mean we could let all animals die and stop existing because we have no use for them, or should we do our best to maintain biodiversity and life on this planet?