ubergeek

joined 6 months ago
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Worse for whom?

Things haven't changed a bit for my indigenous neighbors. They are being fucked over just as hard now, as before...

My black neighbors have noticed just as much now as before, cops still abusing their community and their still being ignored economically.

So, worse for white people? Sure.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 18 points 1 month ago (27 children)

Every single one of those elections, the Dems chanting "us or fascism!!"

It's kinda like the gun safety debate: we can not discuss it within 72 hrs of a mass shooting.

After 72 hrs, nobody wants to talk about it, or we have another one.

When will the Dems actually oppose fascism, instead of saying they want to?

Additionally, who is that "boring liberal republic" better for? Certainly not Palestinians. Certainly not for union workers on our rail lines. Not for people becoming houseless. Not for queer people. Not for indigenous peeps, either....

So, just for white, straight people, so we need to keep supporting it?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

I was l33t, and signed up with Prodigy!

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, he’s having an easier time getting laid than most of the people criticizing him on these forums so…

That's a bit of projection. Especially when a lot of people shit talking him on these forums are very likely in polycules...

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It did not, and it had the nickname AOLosers for people using the service.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Or he's your friend's weird, 28 year old brother, whose room is only lit with black lights, and UV reactive posters, has no job, smokes weed all day, and trips all the time, who tells you Mayans invented cell phones.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think a lot had to do with Harris telling e eryone the economy was great, while her potential voters can barely make ends meet, while her opponent was agreeing with the voters that the economy sucked.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I said they were deemed unfit. Like women and children, the elderly, etc. Of course, some women were kept for sex slaves, too. Others were kept for medical experimentation, etc etc.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes, those 1.47 million were those deemed unfit for labor.

Nothing you said disagrees with what I said.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Dying wasn't the goal, for the concentration camps, either, generally. It was creation of a slave labor race. Generally, the ones who were exterminated right out where the ones incapable of work (In the German's eyes).

Kinda the same with slavery. Incapable of hard labor Black people were just put down.

And is murdering them via forced labor different if it only happens in select camps, versus in the cotton fields? Is time frame a difference, really? 6 years to die vs 20 years to die... Honestly, the former is likely more "humane"...

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, because it would lead them to believe gang members are also being killed.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nobody ever leaves CECOT alive so what are these gangs supposedly gaining by agreeing to this?

Loyalty from the gang members still inside.

Amazingly, gang leaders are very often able to operate even while in prison. And of course, there's possible hits inside of the prison system that need to be "taken care of" by members inside.

Prisons are just an extension, basically, for gang life.

I take one issue who you're replying to: Violent crime will go up, but first, there will be massive dollars on Bukake's head.

view more: ‹ prev next ›