this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
1189 points (96.7% liked)

World News

46010 readers
3309 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Social media influencers are fuelling a rise in misogyny and sexism in the UK's classrooms, according to teachers.

More than 5,800 teachers were polled... and nearly three in five (59%) said they believe social media use has contributed to a deterioration in pupils' behaviour.

One teacher said she'd had 10-year-old boys "refuse to speak to [her]...because [she is] a woman". Another said "the Andrew Tate phenomena had a huge impact on how [pupils] interacted with females and males they did not see as 'masculine'".

"There is an urgent need for concerted action... to safeguard all children and young people from the dangerous influence of far-right populists and extremists."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some of you need more empathy. These are children whose insecurities are being exploited for profit. Be mad at their parents, and be mad at figures like Andrew Tate. But these are children and they deserve more grace than that.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I know it'll come across as an unpopular opinion, but some of them just need their ass kicked. Literally went to high school with a kid who was insufferable, a prick to everyone. One day he started bullying one of my buddies who proceeded to beat the shit out of him. He told his football coach he ran into a mailbox on his bike when he had to explain his face looking like it did. After that he was the nicest kid ever - he realized "being tough" wasn't all it was cracked up to be. I guarantee a few of these kids just need to get punched in the face one time and they'll start rethinking the "alpha male" ideology.

[–] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Beating children into submission might be convenient for you, but its almost certainly not the correct way to handle the situation.

[–] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It is extremely effective at making sure people behave the proper way. It's the same philosophy behind small, weak prey being scared of big, strong predators.

[–] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

You sound like the alpha male people. We're not wolves. We are capable of complex conversation, and we can behave properly out of respect for others and not out of fear.

Maybe children would be less receptive to tate-like figures if it didn't seem like the whole world wanted them dead.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fine, just fail them. This is a problem for the parents to address. And if the parents refuse, then they can enjoy having a child who lives off of benefits and aspires to be an "influencer". Lol.

[–] pablodaniel@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago

You don't actually need to talk to the teacher to pass a class in most cases.

I don't think the kids doing this are doing well in school anyways, but it is possible to never say a word and still get an A from your schoolwork.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

can you blame boys for aspiring to this

[–] LeadLemming@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

King of all the chinless chuds.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You don't need to resort to body shaming to shit on him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peekingduck@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

The funny thing is that people like Tate would be the first to be eaten when the world ends lol

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

If that is where America is heading, to some theocracy like Iran and where men see women as chattel, then I would rather raise children elsewhere there is a culture of empathy.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Research from anti-fascism organisation Hope Not Hate, which polled about 2,000 people across the UK aged 16 to 24, discovered that 41% of young men support Tate versus just 12% of young women.

That is quite a worrying statistic: 41% of young men endorsing a human-trafficking misogynist rapist.

[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

It's even more insane that young women (!!) support a misogynic douchbag. What's wrong with them?

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Let's hope that that's it!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In 10 years, it seems we not only gave up our own nations’ dreams of equality and union, but lustfully decided to lick the boots of those telling us our dreams aren’t worth having. It doesn’t help that the self-proclaimed “leader of the free world” is a known rapist who cuts deals with the Taliban at the expense of women’s liberties.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hyphlosion@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Dude, I never cared who my teachers were, so long as they weren’t jerks. Even then, I got over it.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Sometimes I wonder if the Internet should only be allowed for people 21 or 25 years or older.

21 is the new 16... 25 is the new 21.

But... At the same time older adults are extremely dumb too.

But giving a young person access to the Internet is like letting them walk NYC alone at night during the 70s.

Ever since Facebook and 9/11 the Internet has been kind of awful.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, at this point, I'm on board with just banning social media algorithms entirely. No more personalized feeds. You can have a website that publishes whatever you want, but you can't tailor individual feeds to individual people. People can replace their "feed" with what the original internet was meant to be - visiting a series of websites. Want to read nothing but right wing blogs? Fine. You can spend all day navigating to different URLs for them. But no more spoon feeding individually personalized content to people.

It turns out that method of content delivery is just a very dangerous and damaging technology that really fucks with the workings of the human mind. If you tell AI to build an ideal feed model for a person, it builds a nightmare that traps human beings in skinner boxes.

We can ban these algorithms. We don't have to continue to tolerate their existence. And in the grand scheme of history, it would be no different than a thousand other things that we discovered, at first thought was a panacea, but eventually decided the benefits weren't worth the costs. Asbestos is a fantastic fireproof insulator, but we willingly let those benefits go in lieu of its severe respiratory effects. DDT is an incredible pest killer and insecticide, but it also was rendering entire species of birds extinct. Targeted, individually tailored social media algorithms create entertainment feeds that can entertain us to such degrees that the kings of old would lament their jesters in comparison. But what these algorithms are doing to us, what they are doing to our society? On political polarization? The effects they are having not just on children, but of people of all ages? We as a society need to recognize that the benefits just aren't worth the costs. We are tearing our civilization apart for the sake of cheap entertainment.

We need to ban targeted social media feeds. We have faced technologies like this before. We have made the choice before to give up the benefits of these things for the sake of the greater good. We've done it before, and we can do it again. It is time we ban targeted social media feeds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Dude, we're all stupid. We are all effected by the Internet and propaganda algorithms. We are not superior, most of us just don't realise we're programmed. Exactly the same as Gen Alpha, Zoomers, Gen X and Boomers. We're all profiled and we all see how everyone else is a victim of indoctrination. That's how this works, social engineering innit?

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The problem is that parents - apparently - have no interest in educating their children anymore. They just place their kids in front of a PC or give them an iPad so they can watch TV or something.

Forbidding people from accessing the internet is going to raise a generation of children unfamiliar with it and then drifting off completely. Just look at the NK soldiers when they were shipped to russia and first had access to the internet. Half of them became porn addicts.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We're in for a very, very stupid future.

[–] Really_long_toes@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Idiocracy isn't just a great movie that holds up, it's a accurate depiction of the future and it has electrolytes, it's what plants crave

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just proves he attracts the immature mind

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EuropeanPrimate@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Parents need to raise their children and stop letting social media do it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think about just how many shitty fathers these kids have, most of them in the maga cult that are lapping up the likes of Carlson and Peterson's lessons on red pilled bullshit and condoning the behavior of their kids (albeit from a notably absent distance).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Boppel@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

So? You get a F, you get a F, you get a F...

[–] CoolMatt@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"That fucking stupid removed woman teacher gave me an F because (insert misogynistic mental gymnastics to make it her fault for being female here)"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

I can really recommend the mini series Adolesence on Netflix (or wherever) to get a great, dramatized example of how this effect looks like.

[–] ECEC@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Those little shits should be slapped by their mom's when they get home from school. Suburban trash.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›