this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
832 points (87.8% liked)

Political Memes

9081 readers
2902 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

3-Didn’t go after price gouging, giving Trump a massive gift for his campaign.

I agree with your other points, including the fact that he lost the fucking Republic to fascism through his deeds resulting in his overall legacy being an abject fucking failure, but the tools by which the president could, even purely theoretically, go after price gouging are extremely limited. And political concerns with the ever-fickle and reactionary US electorate would make direct presidential action even of that limited sort of questionable wisdom even for a presidency as motivated on the issue as one headed by Sanders or Warren (assuming the makeup of the rest of the government remained roughly the same).

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

I agree, though I'm starting to think that we're being and limited by our own minds here a little. Look at how much raw power Republicans are exerting now, to much more evil ends, and they're fine doing it. I think if Dems actually grew a spine, many would follow. A reactionary electorate can go both ways, since it's mainly acting on vibes/spite/etc. Most believe nothing ever happens anyway, which is why they tell you to relax when the MAGA breaks key institutions. So I think some direct presidential action in a good direction would be good. Let the pundits scream all they want, they'll call him a communist baby eater anyway.

PS: I hope that was coherent, I didn't proof read it and I haven't had my coffee yet.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Breaking things by not following the rules is easy. All Democrats can do right now is threaten to ... Also break things, hoping Republicans would back down. But that only helps them.

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I don't mean break things so much as push things and not back down the instant some parliamentarian disagrees. I want them to put goals above process, if that makes sense. And obviously to have actual good goals.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)