Greentext

6629 readers

1188 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

Bait or rtaration. Call it. (europe.pub)

submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by nzmaa@lemy.lol to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

164 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While you're absolutely correct, even if Musk lost 99.7% percent of his wealth he would still be a billionaire (depending on whose net worth number you choose to use). I wouldn't hold out seeing him in a bread line or starting a gofundme.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 weeks ago

The real question is whether the collapse of his house of cards will lead to a 99.7% loss of wealth or >100% loss. He won't be a billionaire anymore if it's the latter.