this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
358 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8238 readers
456 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Relevant rant:
๐Ÿ“บ Why the Democratic Party CANNOT and WILL NOT be Reformed
Democrats would rather lose to a Republican, to a conservative, to a fascist, to Trump, than address the material conditions of the American people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] veganbtw@lemmy.ml 44 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (30 children)

The fact that liberals refuse to read just 100 pages of State and Revolution while insisting that they are having new ideas or that the political environment has somehow changed is by far the most frustrating thing about Lemmy comment sections. I'm an anarchist, someone smeared by Lenin in that book but at least I read it and understand. My disagreement is with the vision and form of the dictatorship of the proletariat and how we can build a new commune, not the need for revolution or insisting that somehow, some way after 175 years of the same discussion voting for reform will work.

I swear Americans have never read a book that wasn't Harry Potter in their lives.

[โ€“] enthusiasm_headquarters@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Dude what fucking planet are you living on?

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean? The State and Revolution is a phenomenal booklet.

[โ€“] Grapho@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's short, it's incredibly concise, it doesn't use needless academicisms, and it's surprisingly very funny. It's probably the best value-to-volume ratio of any political text imo.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Oh, that's a tough one! Socialism: Utopian and Scientific is definitely a top contender, but Lenin is clearer. Maybe Foundations of Leninism? Either way, I 100% agree, State and Revolution is a must read.

[โ€“] veganbtw@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

I wish it wasn't the same one as you

load more comments (27 replies)