this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
139 points (94.8% liked)

Asklemmy

47250 readers
803 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

Australia. There really is no better place in the event of nuclear war. It's a continent-island, meaning easy to defend, it grows and can build just about anything, and being in the southern hemisphere it should be safe from nuclear winter.

Specifically, a rural property somewhere agricultural. Maybe Queensland or Tasmania.

If you could move anywhere to minimize the impact on you of the worldwide rise of fascism...

That's almost a different question, though. Whichever European country is the most securely democratic. There's lots of non-war ways fascism can suck aggressively.

[โ€“] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah it might be safe from nuclear winter but it is Australia it already has 10billion other things that can easily kill you.

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That feeling when you survive the apocalypse only to get stung by a platypus and regret that you survived.

[โ€“] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A platypus you mean Perry the platypus

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That show would have been way darker if Perry had ever employed the fact he's a venomous mammal.

Actually, it was a missed opportunity not to go with a female Perry and have an egg-hatching subplot. Their version of the platypus really didn't do much.

[โ€“] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There was one episode where they thought Perry had laid an egg.

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

Oh, nevermind, haha.

load more comments (13 replies)