this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
10 points (77.8% liked)
Opensource
2486 readers
45 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Again, these puritan open source defenders. "It's not open source if $bibleQuote". "Just call it source available". And all the other arguments.
From what I gather, the licence is still in the spirit of open source, just not to the letter. It doesn't want large businesses taking the code , making a competitor and nor contributing back.
These open source defenders do not care about developers and their lives. They just want the code be released in a manner that respects their bible, to the letter.
Anti Commercial-AI license
Open source gets wildly abused by big business. So I'm fine with that.
Fine with the licence this dude wrote or with defending the "one true" definition of open source?
Anti Commercial-AI license