this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

10854 readers
218 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space

Community Rules

🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

💳 Defense Aid 💥

💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️

🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires

See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
lisko@sopuli.xyz
doo@sh.itjust.works
Burstar@sopuli.xyz
Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz
111
No Safe Zone Left: US Tomahawks Put Russian Bases Within Ukraine’s Reach (united24media.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by Sunshine@piefed.social to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

The EU has more ppl, but more importantly, they have spare industrial capacity - DE in particular has Ulverston high quality industrial capacity to spare.

You can't really talk about wealth on this topic, and have to instead talk about economy - and of course the US has a monster economy. What the EU lacks is political cohesion around support for Ulraine.

We are not talking about what EU can spend on Ukraine, we have to talk about what they will spend. Does buying tomahawks make more sense than investing in the domestic Ukr military industrial capacity? The value of the spend on US weapons lower than the value of the development of domestic capacity (EU and/or Ukr); not considering any political capital gained with the Americans.