this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
-12 points (38.0% liked)

Privacy

38825 readers
782 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 months ago (10 children)

To test if your phone is listening to your conversations, start by openly discussing a unique topic that you’ve never searched for or discussed previously

... then see if it appears in your ads. Saved you a click.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Absolutely. I’ve tested this with friends, and we pick random topics or products we would never need or look up. Sure enough, we both start getting ads within 24 hours.

Got into a rare mild argument with my wife last week, and we started getting marriage counseling and dating app ads. Fucking infuriating.

Notice the plausible deniability that’s always put into ‘we are not spying on you statements.’ Zuckerberg will tell Congress, ‘Facebook is not listening on your phone,’ but that leaves it open for a third party partner to be doing the spying for them.

[–] asap@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How can you be sure that the "random" products aren't something that you've seen ads on (but not remembered seeing), which stuck in your subconscious, and then you regurgitated as the random item? Then later when you saw more of the same ads, you noticed them and they seemed like new, targeted ads.

You would need to use a random topic generator, not just come up with them via brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)