this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
63 points (98.5% liked)
Ukraine
9761 readers
504 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because the only way to hold a capitalists attention is with money.
Minerals take time to dig up, during those decades attacks on Ukraine would cut into the profits of American oligarchs.
Considering the GOPs ties to Russia, there is some fear that the USA could switch sides entirely and help Russia.
[...]
I understand the issue of shutting down starlink would currently severely impact Ukraine, but I can also see how starlink won't be necessary in the near future as drones switch to AI and fibre, and a bunch of tech we don't know about yet.
It's only used in some large (manly naval) drones, as it is big and heavy. I think starlink is more important for communication between units and command.
It's trying to buy peace and sovereignty in a world the America only values money.
While the new german government might be more likely to send missiles, I don't see any large changes in the near future. Unless countries can be convinced to give Ukraine unlimited acces to their own military's modern equipment or commit their own soldiers.