this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
1070 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35242 readers
4760 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You know how California got sick of greedy companies ripping off people for insulin so now they're going to sell insulin themselves at a reasonable price? Yeah, they should do that with apartments.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This literally happens in some areas outside the US. I can't remember if it's NotJustBikes or HappyTowns that talks about it on YouTube. But basically, the government offers affordable housing to force landlords to compete on quality and price. Shockingly in those areas rents are down and the quality of apartments is decent.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's fairly standard for each municipality here in sweden to own a landlord company that has some small fraction of the local housing supply and is explicitly for the public good.
I've lived in such housing basically my entire life and it's so hilariously superior to anything else that if they removed the arbitrary limit on how much housing they can own, the municipal landlords would utterly dominate and the total spending on housing would probably drop by 50%..

[–] lemonwood@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Vienna, Austria is a classic example. Don't know about the current situation, though.

[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

California’s housing would be much less of an issue if the high speed rail was built

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

High speed rail such a great way to travel medium distances anyway it’s downright criminal the US hasn’t figured it out yet.

[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

thank you I feel like I’m taking crazy pills when I think about this. It would revolutionize California. More affordable housing Central Valley with career opportunities in whichever city, less pollution, less car wrecks, likely to stimulate the economy.

There is a reason Musk tried blocking the high speed rail from getting built- it’s so he can sell more cars CA is his biggest buyer, if the rail was built he would be saying goodbye to his foothold in CA.

If you spend enough time in CA, it’s unbelievable how clear it is this rail needs to be built, and not in the next 30 years, we need it now

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not just california, basically the entire world has maybe 10% of the HSR that should exist, japan is the only country i feel has a sufficient amount of railways.

[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Agreed. I just mention CA because I know the rail is something they have been fighting for here and it would change the entire state, which typically leads the rest of America.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Let's all keep doing more and getting more people active to get it done. We got this. Same thing for other states as well. With every state getting mid-range high speed rail. Then we can get bullet trains for long distances

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It will happen eventually just needs more people doing and more proper usage of funding. Can't wait for upgrade from 39.5 million people to 200 million. Making it a full fledged country with amount of people to back it up. If California can develop in same Japan and South Korea do that would be awesome

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This is a great idea. Multiple states should band together to make this happen as well

[–] ProbablyBaysean@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

I lived in a housing market like that. It was a college town dominated by a church subsidized school. The students had to live in on-campus, off-campus and registered, or unregulated housing. The only people allowed to do unregulated housing were those who had their stuff together e.g. married or living with family. Housing was cheap and any landlord disagreements could be complained against the uni housing office. The uni provided so much housing that prices were based on the uni's low cost instead of anything higher. A friend from high school had her dad choose to "invest" by buying a small apartment building out there, but even with his daughter as manager, he didn't make a good return because he didn't have the scale to provide the minimum level of service. I think he sold it.

Students there tended to get married and have children while still in school.

Long story short, housing market regulation can be done via a dominating entity over demand, but non market forces are not common everywhere.