this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)

PieFed Meta

4771 readers
121 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Seems like a solid idea and feature in my opinion as it eases the ability for anyone to prevent/call out ill-behaved fellow users, mods, and admins👍

  • sort of like how open-source project revisions are publicly accessible

Edit:
From the post screenshot:

Posts older than 168 days will be removed.

I'm sorry what? but why?

[–] wjs018@piefed.social 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

An instance admin is able to set a retention time for a community on their server. It doesn't delete the content from the remote instance, just the local, federated copy. It's done on a community by community basis and the default is to not delete. The retention times on piefed.social are managed by rimu, and he's not what you would call a meme-er(?), so they aren't too long for meme-y(?) communities.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

if that also deletes the images, I could see how that would save a ton of storage space to delete memes after they get old, and if it's like Mastodon I think it only deletes the ones that come from remote instances

[–] rimu@piefed.social 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yes it deletes the images, to save space.

There are a lot of communities that have content which is amusing for a moment but which have no lasting value so I see no reason to keep paying to store it forever.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 2 points 8 months ago

Totally fair! That would definitely make a huge difference in server costs, and I've seen the same thing used effectively on Mastodon

[–] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 5 points 8 months ago

Reading your comment in addition to the comment chain it makes more sense now and honestly seems pretty reasonable🫡