this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

51425 readers
368 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In terms of cost of an ad to earnings, and how well, even a targeted ad, can hold a viewer's attention. Have we just become numb to ads? Does targeted advertising actually yield better results?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone who uses ad blockers, almost every time i buy something. If i want something, I'll find it. I don't need marketing vermin telling me what I should want based on who gave them money. I also hate ads enough that i specifically avoid buying anything for which i have seen or heard an advertisement.

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You go to the store with your eyes closed and pick at random I assume? Product packaging is advertising.

[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'd say technically it is just product labeling, since I'm not forced to interact with between TV shows or games. Have you seen the NoName brand?

Also I regularly go to an Indian Grocery where packed are plain and I can't read the language, I spend a few bucks and get a good or bad surprise LOL.

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah this is advertising. It's very distinct and clear; done intentionally to stand out amongst other products and be appealing to disinterested consumers.

[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's branding.

Advertising would be "best pumpkin pie filling, everyone's choice" on the label. Also if you go to their no frills store its all this.

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right so companies put branding on their products to... not advertise themselves to consumers?

[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I go by this definition. Marketing is branding and advertisements.

The activity of attracting public attention to a product or business by paid announcements in the print, broadcast, or electronic media.

[โ€“] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lol no. Branding is not advertising just like getting smacked in the face isn't domestic abuse unless the context is correct.

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Beating my children (consensually) to prove packaging with the purpose of attracting attention isn't advertising

[โ€“] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope. Advertising is based on paying a third party. The company didn't pay someone else to show you that packaging when you didn't ask for it.

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No it's not, Toyota putting Toyota badges on their cars is advertising.

[โ€“] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did you even read the definition?

[โ€“] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep. And, like a sensible user of language, I recognised that it could be stretched to include your odd definition, but chose to stay with the combination of what was written in the dictionary and what is the common-use definition because the rest of the English-speaking world is under no obligation to stretch out the definition to help you. Everyone knows what ads are. Only a particularly obtuse user of language would call 'an intrusive video, put in front of you for the benefit of other people and the detriment of society' and 'a label of manufacturer of the object you are currently looking at, being used as an identifier' the same thing. They don't look alike. They don't serve the same purposes. One interacts with them in different ways. Only in the idiosyncratic space of marketing theory would one call them the same.

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[โ€“] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you going to present some evidence of where I have made a mistake in my reasoning or just 'cope' by pretending to have some insight into my mental state that invalidates the points I made in order to avoid acknowledging you were wrong?

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish you well, kid, but goodbye.

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago

Sunsofold wept

[โ€“] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're good at projection.

How pathetic.

[โ€“] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Projecting my feelings onto others like brands project ads onto packaging