News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
The state facilities could always be better, but they're underfunded and the state employees union means the worst employees stay on being the worst for years at a time while the best employees have to pick up their slack.
That being said, I'm entirely unconvinced that they're going to fare better because not all of them have family to turn to, unlike Mr. Raymond in the article. He's very lucky to have a niece with enough financial stability and willingness to care for him. This article deeply overestimates how many disabled people have access to that.
I don't like the state facilities and think they need better funding, more controls on who works for them, more power to remove employees who are dangerous to the patients, more freedom for the patients, and so on.
However, I know for a fact having known many caretakers here in Washington in my life, that the private facilities are more costly, have even fewer protections, regularly hire terrible people, underpay the caretakers, don't give the caretakers the tools they need to effectively care for their wards, and treat the people at the facilities as bad or often worse than the government run facilities.
And honestly I'm disgusted that this article starts with Mr. Raymond's memories from how things were carried out in those facilities over fifty fucking years ago versus how they are carried out today. Things have changed a great deal for the better, in that time, and they could change a great deal for the better if we gave them opportunity to do so. Yet it starts out with fear mongering from a by-gone era and spends almost no time discussion current conditions at all.
Final note, Washington doesn't have an income tax, and has one of the most regressive tax structures in the US. Maybe if we bothered to actually change that and get that capital gains tax finalized and accepted by the courts we could actually afford things like this instead of always throwing our fucking hands up and going "whoopsie doodles we don't have enough money time to cut services for the poor again."
It seems like their maths won't check out. They already estimate 66% of current residents to move on to other facilities (guess they don't have licensed care takers as relatives to take them all in), yet seem to calculate with saving all the costs. Ultimately they'll push more work towards the other facilities without any intention of financing additional staff which will not work in the long run.