WrenFeathers

Yeah. 0 points. I either aced it, or I colossally failed it depending on perspective.

But they’re saying they do know. And they are correct.

I do know. It’s not sentient at all. But don’t get angry at me about this. You can put that all on science.

You know “Grok” is not a sentient being, right? Please tell us you understand this simple fact- because you just defended a computer program as deserving rhetoric same freedoms as a human being.

I can say from experience that in at least some corners of social media, (LW for example) the removal of “Luigi content” is strictly because a large amount of it is advocations of violence/murder/assasinaion.

On many social media platforms, that type of content is against ToS because of the laws in the country that hosts the platform that the site is located in.

It has little to do with personal opinion and everything to do with staying within the legal threshold of the region to avoid being shut down.

You didn’t vote to protect it, I don’t think you get to claim it. You abandoned it.

Discussion over.

“We?”

I’m going to explain this for you as simply as possible:

So.. Imagine a scenario where a driverless car is rolling towards a baby in a carriage. Now imagine there are 10 people, one of them being you- standing about within eyesight of the car that is heading towards the baby-

In this scenario:

The car = trump.
The baby = our democracy.
The 10 people = the only influence able to change the scenario.

Now, what ties this all together to make it more relevant is that we will now give the people standing about the choice to to push the car into the baby, do nothing, or stand in the way of the car in order to stop it.

This means that:

5 people that will push the car into the baby = Trump supporter.
1 person that will do nothing = you.
4 people that will push the car away = Harris voters.

So now… Here we have two groups of people that have no intent whatsoever to help the child in any way. One- directly and the other indirectly- and only one group that is trying to stop the car.

Those standing around watching, (you) could help stop the car- but don’t. Thereby watching the car roll over the child because not enough people helped stop it.

You made the choice to withdraw your help and thereby share in the responsibility.

He won that tournament in the same way his puppeteer Putin “wins” an election.

I’m not sure I’d ever put TS in the same sentence with that Nazi gremlin.

Oui!