this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
-1 points (47.6% liked)

collapse

274 readers
12 users here now

Placeholder for time being, moving from lemm.ee

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Obviously the collapse process is not uniform in space and time, and boundary conditions can accelerate or delay it, in a given compartment.

For instance, the apparent goal of the proxy conflict is to destabilize and weaken Russia, damage relationships of the EU core countries with Russia and China (and Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, etc.), extract resources (weapons purchases, attracting industry and talent, etc.) from EU countries to delay collapse of the US heartland. The current EU leadership is acting as compradors in this game, to the great disadvantage of its constituents.

As such policies which disrupt (self-sanctions, blowing up of gas pipelines and oil processing plants) or redispatch (e.g. US selling to EU liquified Russian gas at a premium) energy and essential material flows make local industries non-competitive to US and Asia, and cause accelerated deindustrialization.

In a game "the last man standing wins" that's an obvious disadvantage. But in the end, all of them will go down, eventually.