this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
27 points (96.6% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
4290 readers
245 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Except you're ignoring the part where we've captured microplastics in our atmosphere at various levels including upper.
Microplastics can be carried by water vapor alone.
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/15/7/863 https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/microplastics-impact-cloud-formation-likely-affecting-weather-and-climate https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969723008094
Plenty of more sources that definitively state that nanoe and microplastics ride on water vapor and can be captured in atmosphere.
That is not at all what my point is.
You're asserting that a body of water that has microplastics wouldn't emit them via steam from boiling water, and I just provided you with sources saying that microplastics are present in the water vapor of our atmosphere...meaning they are light enough to be carried in water vapor...steam is water vapor.
You're then trying to assert that microplastics are lighter than air, which they are not. Nano plastics who even knows, but your secondary follow-up makes no sense because the former is true from the links I provided.