this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
346 points (97.8% liked)

Political Memes

10246 readers
1880 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The police were unarmed‽

Police in the People's Republic of China is normally unarmed (just like police in several other countries, most famously the United Kingdom), so while I don't know anything about whether they had been armed at that time at Tiananmen square, any claim that they were unarmed as usual seems perfectly plausible to me.

But don't forget that the army also was sent in there, very armed.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Students.

Fucking students!

You can't tell me in good faith that they were more armed than the fucking police!

Be real homie, does that make sense in any fucking reality?

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You can’t tell me in good faith that they were more armed than the fucking police!

I have no reason to believe that the students were armed either.

And don’t forget that the army also was sent in there, very armed.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What are you arguing?

I'm saying the people in tanks were not unarmed. And the students likely didn't have RPGs.

I'm frustrated trying to understand what you just typed!

The police were not unarmed. As a matter of fact, they had enough arms to murder 512 people that posed no that to the people in fucking tanks!!

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What are you arguing?

I'm arguing that any claim that the police was unarmed is perfectly plausible, as this is normal for police in the People’s Republic of China.

I’m saying the people in tanks were not unarmed.

There's absolutely no disagreement about that.

And the students likely didn’t have RPGs.

There's absolutely no disagreement about that.

The police were not unarmed.

Are you sure about that? Where do you have that information from? That would have been most unusual.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago

Yes. I am sure about that.