this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026

497 points (99.4% liked)

News

34105 readers

3113 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

497

Protesters decrying the killing of Renée Good know what they saw with their own eyes. (www.motherjones.com)

submitted 18 hours ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In the immediate aftermath of the ICE killing of Renée Good in Minneapolis last week, the Trump administration smeared her as a “domestic terrorist,” claiming that she had weaponized her vehicle. They labeled Good a “violent rioter” and insisted every new video angle proved their version of the truth: Good was a menace and the ICE agent a potential victim. That’s despite video evidence to the contrary, showing Good, by all appearances, trying to leave the scene of the altercation, while ICE agents acted aggressively. Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, spent Sunday doubling down, insisting that Good had supposedly been “breaking the law by impeding and obstructing a law enforcement operation.”

So, on Sunday, I joined the throng in Manhattan for one of many dozens of protests held around the country this past weekend. In the middle of Fifth Avenue, surrounded by raucous, defiant New Yorkers, I asked protesters the simple question: What did you see?

“I mean, it seems like the bottomless, self-radicalizing thing that the government is going through,” said Anne Perryman, 85, a former journalist. “Is there any point when they’re actually at the bottom, and they’re not going to get any worse? I don’t think so.”

“I think there’s a small minority of Americans who are buying that,” said Kobe Amos, a 29-year-old lawyer, describing reactions to the government’s gaslighting. “It’s obviously enough to do a lot of damage. But if you look around, people are angry.”

“I saw an agent that overreacted,” he added, “and did something that was what—I think it’s murder.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm angry at all the commenters here to suggest that Americans should fight in the streets, for whatever reason. You did that repeatedly and almost as a joke.

I can't speak to allegations of "pushing" one way or another because for all the videos I have seen myself, I have seen exactly zero ICE agents being pushed, and frankly your claim that it's happening seems blatantly unbelievable without some kind of video. If you have it, link it.

But while I'm bringing the receipts, here's the TRO (temporary restraining order) that got the National Guard kicked out of Chicago: after this was filed and the orange pedo lost on appeal, he abandoned his effort to keep the National Guard there:

https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/46a35c5459e8b073/66434a34-full.pdf

Again, proof that non-violence is working and the courts are holding. As long as they do, lay off suggestions of non-peaceful resistance.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I've seen large groups of people pushing a few agents off from abducting some latinos, and it works. I've seen probably 5 different videos in the last few months of that. It actually works to save people from being disappeared when we have the numbers.

Where is your red line for getting "serious"? When he cancels midterms or otherwise rigs it against any Democrats? What they just ignore the courts (as they've done a bunch of times in other areas).

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I have no idea what you mean by "serious," only that you clearly mean something different by that word than I do, to the point that you offer it in quotes as though it is your euphemism for something else. Go ahead and define it if you want to discuss it.

And I have no idea what you mean by "red line" either. A line suggests a point at which I will change from one position to another, but I've repeatedly and explicitly stated my positions without generalities all along. Why do you have such difficulty stating what you plainly mean? Just go ahead and say it. What are you referring to by "red line"?

EDITED TO ADD: You know what, never mind. I've reread your comments and you are clearly just advocating for violence. Get lost. Blocking you now.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Dude read the fucking room