Yeah but even if you could get it down to like 50% why would anyone want to take that risk? Idk I might be misunderstanding something about how TOR works but it seems no more anonymous than the clearweb from what I've heard.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure you are fully aware of the Tor threat model. The exit node is not supposed to be specifically trusted.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

TOR is not to be trusted. Everyone else has been working on strengthening their security while TOR has been caught numerous times weakening theirs.

Use i2P and sneakernet. Fuck tor.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh i2P is definitively a better option where you can have it. However, Tor is somewhat more approachable as of current: we have for example Tor Browser for the masses, whereas I at least haven't heard of any sort of "I2P Browser" at least for Firefox. Of the three options, Tor is the only one I know that is "portable" (you don't need to be able to make admin-level network changes to use it).

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I2p doesn’t have a browser setup extension or something last I checked. TOR browser has been caught lying and degrading security repeatedly. A big part of the problem with tor is the damn browser.