this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
379 points (99.0% liked)

PC Gaming

14259 readers
188 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They sue over this but not when ICE used their Pokemon IP on their videos?

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's 2 different companies (Nintendo vs The Pokemon Company). But also yeah, obviously they have much more to gain when it's about $200B.

[–] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I have to suspect it's 200b yen, even though the article states "$200 billion". The later with a 15% tarrif would imply $1.33 trillion in US sales in the last year, which I highly doubt

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to news sites, the US government took in about $166 billion, although I'm also seeing $175 billion floating around. CBP is claiming that they can't comply with the refund order as quickly as they want because of technological and manpower excuses. They're claiming that the large number of refunds and the current manpower is limiting their ability to quickly issue these refunds.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Manpower? They could use the ICE idiots as manpower

[–] oddpixel@lemmy.wtf 7 points 1 week ago

They'd be awfully upset if they could read what you just suggested.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

You expect them to be able to read numbers?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

The article states $166 billion in duties and tariffs total, not from Nintendo products. It doesn't actually state an amount for Nintendo in particular.

Sadly they had no legal standing on that due to parody law. I'm sure they would have of they could have.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

nintendo only owns 1/3 of pokemon apparently, the other is gamefrek/masuda, i forgot the 3rd one.

[–] NotSafeForWorld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Charzard4261@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

The Pokémon Company is a joint venture between Nintendo, GameFreak and Creatures Inc. Control of TPC is what people mean when they say Nintendo/GameFreak "own" 30%.

The story behind the trio is an interesting read, and IIRC Creatures is like wholly owned by Nintendo anyway so they technically have majority control of TPC.

[–] Jomega@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Music rights are notoriously convoluted. Long story short, that's not their department.