this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
767 points (98.6% liked)

Funny

9305 readers
1454 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

It was because of the shielding on the entire back.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

It was a huge chunk of thick glass. The flatter they made them, the thicker the glass had to be to withstand the vacuum.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

No, because the front was flat and rather large, the tube was appropriately long and heavy, Shielding was just thin sheets, nothing to write home about. The mounts holding the tube though were massive and distributed the weight both to the feet and the handles on the sides.