this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
65 points (98.5% liked)

Dull Men's Club

3774 readers
243 users here now

An unofficial chapter of the popular Dull Men's Club.

https://dullmensclub.com/

1. Relevant commentary on your own dull life. Posts should be about your own dull, lived experience. This is our most important rule. Direct questions, random thoughts, comment baiting, advice seeking, many uses of "discuss" rarely comply with this rule.

2. Original, Fresh, Meaningful Content.

3. Avoid repetitive topics.

4. This is not a search engine
Use a search engine, a tradesperson, Reddit, friends, a specialist Facebook group, apps, Wikipedia, an AI chat, a reverse image search etc. to answer simple questions or identify objects. Also see rule 1, “comment baiting”.

There are a number of content specific communities with subject matter experts who can help you.

Some other communities to consider before posting:

5. Keep it dull. If it puts us to sleep, it’s on the right track. Examples of likely not dull: jokes, gross stuff (including toes), politics, religion, royalty, illness or injury, killing things for fun, or promotional content. Feel free to post these elsewhere.

6. No hate speech, sexism, or bullying No sexism, hate speech, degrading or excessively foul language, or other harmful language. No othering or dehumanizing of anyone or negativity towards any gender identity.

7. Proofread before posting. Use good grammar and punctuation. Avoid useless phrases. Some examples: - starting a post with "So" - starting a post with pointless phrases, like "I hope this is allowed" or “this is my first post” Only share good quality, cropped images. Do not share screenshots of images; share the original image.

.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Spent 10 minutes with my SO, moving our shared deductions between us to see which distribution resulted in the lowest amount of taxes. Turns out that the tax authorities are pretty good at what they do, as the best distribution was what they'd already prefilled.

Despite having very different income, no matter how we moved the numbers, the numbers at the bottom didn't change in a manner where the total would result in a higher refund.

So we both ended up filing our taxes with no changes to the prefilled values.

EDIT:
TIL that the Norwegian tax authorities appear to have an official youtube channel. There you can see an example in English how it's done. Can't wait for them to have a youtube reaction face thumbnail or a collab with MrBeast.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The USA system -- both federal and state-level -- is a bungled attempt at doing all of these things simultaneously: revenue collection, grant issuance, welfare, equity, economic incentives, and monetary penalties. And the results show: it's woefully unfit at any of these objectives, and the agencies responsible for administering this convoluted mess are left to divine the intended objective from the law and hopefully reach some sort of sane conclusion.

As a reference for fellow Americans, the idea that child welfare is administered through the tax system is not common through the world. That is to say, a "child tax credit" would just be a issued directly from a government agency, with maybe one form to set up direct deposit. Same with economic incentives: rather than a "refundable heat pump tax credit", other countries just give out grants when you show that you've met the qualifications. Remarkably, the USA already have such a system, in the form of municipalities or local utilities that either issue these grants themselves, or work with local suppliers to implement point-of-sale discounts (eg LED light bulbs).

Separating such concerns from the taxation system means that people who don't file taxes -- usually because they're below the 0% tax rate, which would be the standard deduction at the USA federal level -- can still get the full benefit of welfare and grants. A negative example is when a tax credit is "non-refundable", meaning that if the taxpayer doesn't pay enough tax, they lose the benefit of the credit. Nobody is better off for this.

It also avoids the absurd result where the tax authorities have to figure out whether a particular piece of HVAC equipment meets the qualifications set out in the tax code. The IRS (federal) or equivalent state agency does not specialize in such determinations, so there will inevitably be mistakes if they have to do this. Instead, an agency like the USA Dept of Energy would be much more qualified to administer that task.

Finally, because of the litany of such "elective" tax credits or deductions -- meaning that whether they apply or not is highly dependent on preconditions -- it makes it functionally impossible for the tax agency to give taxpayers a prefilled tax return form. How can the IRS know if you bought a heat pump this year? Or had a child? Or paid points on a home mortgage loan?

Simplifying the tax code is a prerequisite for prefilled tax forms, but not by the typical neoliberal nonsense of flat-tax rates or whatever. Instead, it comes when the tax agency can focus on doing a single job -- revenue collection -- and work towards doing that task well.