this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
444 points (91.3% liked)

Linux

13102 readers
385 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No, it's the same with every distro.
Distro maintainers CAN'T support repos containing non-free packages with security fixes.
Because they can't fix security issues in the code.
Because the code is not free for them to edit.

This entire criticism just shows a lack of understanding of how distros work, and what security updates are.

[–] Aatube@thriv.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ubuntu Universe does not have licensing issues. Ubuntu's nonfree repository is Multiverse. Universe is just the community- as opposed to project-maintained one

[–] mech@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Same thing applies.
The AUR doesn't get security updates from Arch,
RPM Fusion doesn't get security updates from Fedora,
Packman doesn't get security updates from OpenSUSE,
and Slackbuilds/Alienbob don't get security updates from Slackware.

[–] Aatube@thriv.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

woelk did make a good point that based on submission processes, Fedora Main is basically their equivalent of Ubuntu Universe, though.